og 17 cr 題號547

547.

A provincial government plans to raise the gasoline tax to give people an

incentive to drive less, reducing traffic congestion in the long term. However,

skeptics point out that most people in the province live in areas where cars

are the only viable transportation to jobs and stores and therefore cannot

greatly change their driving habits in response to gasoline prices.

In

light of the skeptics objection, which of the following, if true, would most

logically support the prediction that the government』s plan will achieve its

goal of reducing traffic congestion?

(A) The revenue from the tax will be used to make

public transportation a viable means of transportation to jobs and stores for

far more people.

(B) The tax will encourage many residents to

switch to more fuel-efficient cars, reducing air pollution and other problems.

(C) Because gasoline has been underpriced for

decades, the province has many neighbourhoods where cars are the only means of

transportation.

(D) Most residents who cannot greatly change their

driving habits could compensate for high gasoline prices by reducing other

expenses.

(E) Traffic congestion is an especially serious

problem for people whom cars are the only viable means of transportation.

省政府計劃抬高汽油稅刺激人們少開車，以減少交通擁堵。

然而，質疑者指出，大部分省里人居住在車是唯一交通工具的地方，去上班啊，買東西啥的因此不能因為高油價就改變開車習慣。

考點：目標管理 中的二者因果 他因（必須不同於已知條件並跟結果有關）增強

A. 稅收收入將用於使公共交通被更多人作為交通工具；減少擁堵，目標達到 他因增強

B.要的是達成目標，減少擁堵跟air

pollution無關

C.說的是省里的，跟neighborhoods無關

D.居民還是要開，少逛街，少約飯，少生孩子，我也要買油開車 目標不成，削弱

E.交通擁堵很嚴重，跟達成目標沒關係，無關

推薦閱讀：