探尋文中之靈，咱該想點啥？

對於一些駁論、評判性的文章，我倒甚是喜歡閱讀，而對於其中的奧妙也僅略沾皮毛，獲知甚少。有聽過這樣的一段辯論：某甲：「評論性的文章，如果找不出幾個側重點，沒有尖銳，鋒利的論斷，能引發爭議，就等於沒有論點，沒有活氣，即文章：無『靈』所在。」某乙：「非也，非也，它也可以平和、溫婉的姿勢展開論述，既沒有攻擊性，又易被讀者接受，既沒有爆炸性的爭議，又能與讀者和諧共融。淡然、恬靜、哲理、辯證，可謂均稱適度，不正是『靈』之所在嗎？」

每能閱讀到一篇好文，興趣總會越加濃厚，看一遍總覺得不過癮，所以每篇閱讀最少不在3—5遍以下。因為——人在最初接觸某種事物的時候，印記總會清晰，體味也會別樣，也容易抓住特性，第二次或再多次的探索，反而印象和思路會模糊，扭曲準確的辨別力，而最後能獲得清晰的時刻，應該是你的魂和它的靈能徹底相融的時候，才能真正意義上的讀懂。

所以僅能沾到皮毛，也是一筆很豐富的收穫了。我們觀察創作者的靈感，是否都是源於身邊的事物，或在無意中取自於一些衝突事件，從中獲取靈性；或者觀賞和品讀某種讀物或劇作，加以批判和讚賞；或者是生活中的感悟和總結，在最短的時間內一次性定稿；或者資質深厚的筆者提筆成文，等。

當一種邏輯以迷離、模糊、探索、又近乎有一定的潛意識思維規則的形式出現時，它總會充滿無限的誘惑。這也正是美文對於我的誘惑。創作手法，著筆即不像散文中側重某個局部性的煽情敘述，又不像小說中神情、動作、形態、環境等深情並茂的全方位描述，而是在某種邏輯狀態中的思維推理論證。不側重偏倚、不故弄玄虛，而是以一種很自然大氣的格度，佔據了閱讀者的思維。說不上是因為你看懂了，而是本身就具有超常態的萬有引力，不由得讓你去探索，讓你去追逐，讓你去尋求，讓你在是懂非懂中去遊離，去想像，去剖解，在明白與不明白間充滿誘惑。在一個小我的邏輯世界裡展開無限的遐想，而這種格局的空間更是無限寬廣，卻又渾然於一體。看得見，但摸不著，看懂了，卻也不明白。

或許，這就是一種通靈的「變性」，永遠都是一個「迷」，也正是一篇好文的「靈」之所在吧……

In this paper, we explore the spirit, to the point of what?

For some personal, critical articles, I very love reading, for it is only slightly stained with fur, little. Have heard such a debate: "a commentary, if not a few points, no sharp, sharp on the break, can cause there is no controversy, argument, no vitality, that article: No" spirit "." B: "no, no, it can also be calm and gentle posture is discussed, which is not offensive, and easily accepted by readers, no explosive dispute, but also with the readers of harmony thaw. Cool, quiet, philosophy, dialectical, is called moderation, is not" spirit "is?"

Everyone can read a good article, interest will become increasingly strong, look again feel not fun, so each reading at least not in the 3 - 5 times. Because when people in the initial contact with certain things, always will appreciate the clear mark, otherwise, easy to grasp the characteristics of second or more times of exploration instead, impression and ideas will be blurred, distorted and accurate discrimination, and finally to obtain a clear time, should be your soul and its spirit can completely compatible, can truly understand.

I can only touch the fur, but also a very rich harvest. We observed the creators of inspiration, whether is from the side of things, or inadvertently taken from a number of incidents, get spiritual from viewing and reading; or some books or plays, criticism and appreciation; or life in the perception and summary, in the shortest possible time once finalized or qualifications of the author; profound writing, etc..

As a kind of logic to fuzzy, blurred, exploration, and almost certain the subconscious mind in the form of rules, it is always full of infinite temptation. This is not for me. The temptation of creation, the pen that unlike prose focused on a particular local sensational narration, unlike the novel expression. Action, form, comprehensive description of the environment and affectionate, but in a state of thinking logic reasoning. Dont focus on bias, but do not kick up a cloud of dust in a very natural, atmosphere lattice degree, occupy the readers thinking. Not because you understand, but itself has a universal gravitation super normal, you can not help to explore, let you go, let you go for, let you in is to understand not understand to go free, to imagine, to understand and do not understand the anatomy, full of temptation. Launched an unlimited source in a small world of logic Think this pattern space is infinite, but not in one. See, but not to feel, understand, but also do not understand.

Perhaps, this is a kind of psychic "degeneration", is always a "fan", it is also a good article of the "spirit" of the bar.

推薦閱讀：