反駁外國人對中國教育的「西方的習慣性惡意」

針對一個外國人的「西方人的習慣性惡意」的反駁。

他以中國素質教育問題為入口,故意忽略我國教育的基礎背景和目的,否定中國的現實教育成功;然後用人的素質差別或表現來否定國內企業管理,進而來兜售針對中國企業的管理諮詢服務。

原帖地址:中國教育系統需要哪些有用的補充?來自一個德國企業家的聲音

以下是我的反駁:

這是一個討論和批判了很久的老故事。如果僅僅是這樣,我認為你根本沒有理解中國的教育體系;

這裡你犯了兩個錯誤:

1、不了解中國教育;

2、在不了解的基礎上,隨意批判中國的教育;

關於中國的教育

1、你忽略了中國的公民教育的基本訴求:足夠低廉、是否能找到工作;

2、你忽略了過去30年里中國的現實基礎和國家教育的目的:培養大量受教育人群,服務於大規模工業化.

3、你忽略了中國國家教育的應對未來競爭的方式:中國的方法是:培養大規模的標準人力,讓他們在社會上進化,而不是像西方在學校里養成。

它背後的的原因

1,中國人口多,我們的政府暫時無力承擔過高的素質教育成本,而只能專註於普及形式的基礎教育;

2,中國可以基於人口多,讓他們在社會中進化,篩選出足夠的高素質人才;這部分人帶領了中國成為世界強國;

警告

1、如果沒有深入了解,請不要隨意用聽來的東西代表你。這樣會讓我們覺得你作為一個西方人,表現得很傲慢。

2,各個國家有各個國家教育的基礎背景、特點、目的,如果不理解,請尊重它。

3、教育和國家發展並沒有絕對的關係。比如:你無法忽略時間。中國才發展30年,西方世界200年...它們有足夠的時間去沉澱、總結,也有足夠的資源去投入...我們沒有。

【旁白】

在羨慕西方素質教育的同時,你可能不知道他們大學學費一般上萬USD/年,就單單買書就需要上千USD/學期......

--

【附英文,請原諒我的英文水平..2333】

This is an old story that has been discussed and criticized for a long time.

If those words you said is the case, I think you dont understand the Chinese educational system at all;

You have made two mistakes here:

1,You do not know Chinese education;

2,On the basis of that, you criticized Chinese education at will.

About Chinese education:

1,You ignored the basic demands of Chinas Civic Education: Whether it is cheap enough ;Whether it is easy to find a job.

2,You ignored the realistic basis of China and the purpose of national education in last 30 years:Sufficient number of educated people; Serving for large-scale industrialization.

3,You ignored the way that Chinas national education has been coping with the future competition:To develop a large scale of standard manpower for them to evolve in society rather than in schools like the West.

The reasons behind:

1,China has a large population, and our government is temporarily unable to afford the high cost of quality education, but it can only focus on the basic education in the form of popularization.

2,China can be based on the population,and select enough high-quality talents; These people can lead China to become a new world power.

Warning you:

1,If you dont have a deep-going comprehending, please do not use what you listen to represent you. This will make us consider you as an arrogant westerner.

2,Education in every country has its own background, characteristics and purposes. If you dont understand, please respect it.

3, There is no absolute relationship between education and national development. For example: you cant ignore the time. China has only developed for 30 years, the western world has been 200 years... They have enough time to precipitate, summarize, and have enough resources to invest... We do not.


推薦閱讀:

中國在2049年會發展到什麼程度?
美國所標榜的民主是真實的嗎?是民主制度保障了民主還是民主的人民保障了民主?
為什麼中國人均GDP低,但是生活質量高?
特朗普的"禁穆令"有沒有什麼好處?
有人常常宣揚「美國是最民主、最自由的國家」,這是否是把美國的社會現狀斷章取義的結果?

TAG:西方 | 政治 | 教育 |