MBTI, Socionics, 九型人格及其副型理論的交叉點

這篇只和mbti沾點邊，不過還是扔專欄里吧

Those who have spent some time studying MBTI, socionics, and enneagram types usually notice that they overlap in several traits, making it easy to mis-attribute traits from one system to another. Here are a few common "crossroads":

學了一陣MBTI、socionics和九型人格的人往往會發現，這些理論有的時候會互相重疊，容易使得人們在解釋某些人格特點的時候用錯理論。以下是一些交叉點。

1. SO-first need for connection with the greater social scene may be mistaken for extroversion. SO-last stackings, to the contrary, highlight traits commonly attributed to introversion.

so/sx與so/sp的需求之一：更大的社交圈，這點被誤認為是外傾。相反地，so blind的一些特點被誤認為是內傾。

2. Social instinct is sometimes mistaken for Fe, ethics in general, and "Aristocratic" trait in socionics. This is because stackings with SO instinct have a proclivity to interpret events within socio-cultural context and may exhibit a pronounced interest in soft sciences.

so被誤認為是Fe，被誤認為是socionics中的貴族做派。因為so在前兩位的類型傾向把事物放到大的社會文化背景中去解釋，也可能會顯露出對人文社科的濃厚的興趣。

3.Social, inclusive, friendly, and sometimes bubbly nature of SO-firsts and SX/SO can lead them to be taken for Ethical types.

so/sx、so/sp和sx/so：好社交、包容心強、友善，有的還開朗活潑，被當成Exx或xEx型（註：看不懂的去搜socionics）（在這裡就當它是MBTI中的F型吧）

4. SX-first craving for enlivening, intense experiences and sometimes lowered barrier to confrontation can be mistaken for extraverted sensing (Se) and extraverted feeling (Fe). SX-firsts may inadvertently draw attention to themselves in a way that overlaps with socionics Fe-HA. SX/SO stackings often exhibit contarian, revolutionary attitudes that is often confused for belonging to Beta quadra. On a more rare occasion SX emphasis and insistence of their personal preferences, likes and dislikes, is also mistaken for preference for Fi.

sx/sp和sx/so：渴望「生氣勃勃」，渴望刺激的體驗，有時難以容忍停滯不前的局面，被當成Se和Fe。sx/sp和sx/so也許會不經意地吸引他人的注意力，這點與xLE重合。sx/so常常唱反調、愛搞事，令人覺得是Beta象限的那四個類型之一。更罕見的情況：sx注重個人選擇、個人喜好，被當成Fi。

5. Self-preservation (SP) instincts focus on practical and pragmatic matters may be easily confused for sensing and logic. Income and salary concerns, planning, scheduling, budgeting, can be mistaken for strong sensing orientation, Si/Se, as well as extraverted logic, Te. In particular SP/SXs interest in things that serve as common denominators of life (family, food, daily activities and chores, etc.) can lead them to consider themselves to be Sensing types.

sp：務實，很容易被當成S和T。收入與銷售額、計劃、日程表、預算，被當成強S和Te。尤其是sp/sx：看重生活的必需品，比如家庭、食物、日常活動、家務等等，導致這類型的人認為自己可能是S型。

6. The dry sobriety in communication of SX-last stacking can lead them to view themselves as Logical types. This is further reinforced if their main enneagram type is within the head triad.

sx blind：溝通風格枯燥無趣悶，導致這類型的人認為自己是Lxx/xLx（當它是MBTI中的T型好了）。如果這人恰好是腦區（567）的就更容易出現這種情況。

7. Eneagrams head triad, 5-6-7, can be mistaken for T-preference.

腦區被當成T型。

8. Adventurism and search for more satisfying experiences of type 7 can be confused for extraverted sensorics, Se, resulting in erroneous typings of ENxPs and ENxJs - as ESxPs.

7號：冒險主義、尋求更多能令人得到滿足的經歷，被當成Se，ENP和ENJ被當成ESP。

9. Focus on emotional needs, friendship and family bonds, and social obligations of type 2 can be mitaken for preference for extraverted ethics (Fe).

2號：注重情感需求、朋友圈、家族、社會義務，被當成Fe。

出處：http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/content.php/133-Instinctual-Stackings

（不要神化任何一套理論，應該儘可能地細化！一套理論解釋不了的問題就拿兩套解釋）

（typology真是一個大坑啊，如果只是單純地想學習它的話）