||翻譯：Fi&Ti的習性

這裡描述的更多是Fi/Ti作為主輔功能時的情形，因此下文用FP/TP代替功能使用者

Behavior：The Fi may appear to have no feelings and can be negative or profoundly indifferent to people. They tend to shy away from parties, etc., because they gather too much data(they have an extraverted perceiving function) to be evaluated. When Fis are members of a group they tend to be the ethical backbone, influencing the group by their behavior alone. Fis believe they understand everyone else very well, but often perceive themselves as being understood by others. The positive feelings of Fis must be inferred indirectly because their outward demeanor is typically harmonious and inconspicuous and does not necessarily indicate their inner feelings.

Jung(1976a)says that the Fi shows "little effort to respond to the real emotions of the other person." Strangers are shown no special attention. The easiest place to see Fis express their feelings is with their children. Even though Fis are Feeling Types, they are different from Fes in that they do not seem to enjoy the interpersonal closeness of a "group hug" with strangers. Fes, on the other hand, seem to enjoy a good hug with almost anyone.

Fis can be mistaken for Thinking Types because of their perceived lack of "warmth and friendliness." Their outward appearance might seem cold at times.

FP可能看起來像「沒有感情」一般，消極待人甚至極度冷淡。他們可能會逃避一些社交或類似的場合，因為他們收集了太多信息有些評估不過來（他們有Pe功能）。當FP們成為某團隊的一員時，他們往往會成為團隊倫理的中堅力量，僅憑個人行為就能影響整個團隊。FP們認為他們很了解每一個人，但是常常視自己被他人誤解。FP的積極情緒一定不是直接表現出來的，因為他們的外在表現通常是愛好和諧、低調的，並不一定他們內心情感的直接表現。

榮格稱FP「對他人的情緒不做什麼反應」。FP不會特別留意陌生人。最簡便的能觀察到FP流露情感的地方就是和他們的孩子在一起的場合。儘管FP是F型，但和FJ不同的是，他們看起來並不享受「小組擁抱」活動中與陌生人擁抱時的那種親密感。反觀FJ，他們看起來似乎很享受任何一個人的擁抱。

FP可被誤認為是T型因為他們被認為「缺少一份溫暖與友善」。從外表看來FP有時可能看起來很冷漠。

Behavior: the behavior of the Ti Type might appear cold, inflexible, arbitrary or reclusive...Tis tend to be stubborn, headstrong and difficult to influence and, at times, fail to comprehend the importance of their relationships to people or things because these are of secondary importance to them. This makes the Ti unconscious of or blind to other people. Living in an inner world, Tis might fail to realize how others see them. Tis tend to think that everyone sees the illusion the Tis have created in their own minds, instead of reality. ...

Getting Tis to admit that what is clear to them might not be so clear to others can be a difficult task. Tis might throw themselves at people who do not understand, which could cause them to think that people are basically stupid. Jung(1976a)states that they often come across as inconsiderate, prickly, arrogant, sour and anti-social. At times they confuse their ideas (internal "truths")with external reality, then defend their ideas voraciously. When confronted with peoblems, they prefer to withdraw to work them out. The Ti Type can be difficult to understand, to say the least. At times, they may try to placate people just to prevent them from becoming a nuisance. Others observing this might see the Ti as having an ulterior motive. The relentless pursuit and cririque of knowlegde by Kant and Nietzsche are characteristic of Ti.

TP看起來可能是冷漠的、頑固的、武斷的或獨行俠作風的。TP往往倔強、剛愎自用、難以撼動，有時會意識不到人際關係的重要性，因為這些東西對他們來說沒那麼重要。這使得TP不甚了解周圍的人，甚至對周圍的人一無所知。生活在自己的世界裡，TP可能無法意識到他人對他們的看法。TP往往認為，人們看到的是TP設想的假象，而不是事實。

舉例：我有一個TP同事，儘管他很聰明，但他經常有奇怪的作風（原文questionable ethical behavior，我翻譯無能）：對於身邊的人來說他好像隱身了一般。有一回他甚至對工作小組的人表態：「明天我會來辦公室，但是你們看不見(wont see，這裡我認為理解成「忽略」更好)我。」 （然而工作小組的人看到他（並沒有忽略他）了……）

蹩腳的翻譯官這樣理解下劃線的內容（從這個例子出發）：這個TP的設想是「同事看不見/忽略他（具體原因不猜測）」，事實卻是，同事看得見/沒有忽略他。因此TP的設想是「假象」，同事看得見他是「事實」。

「你懂得，但是別人未必懂得」，想讓TP意識到這一點得費一番功夫。TP可能偏偏會碰到一群不懂的人，這會使他們認為「人類真蠢」。榮格稱，在別人眼裡，TP不體諒他人、惹人生厭、自高自大、脾氣差並且反社會。當TP自己的想法（他們心中的「真理」）與客觀現實有所混淆時，他們會大力維護自己的看法。有時當面對問題時，他們寧願當縮頭烏龜也不會去處理問題。可以這麼說，TP是難以理解的類型。有時他們會安撫眾人，只因不想成為眾矢之的；而在別人看來，TP這是動機不純。另外，對知識的不懈追求與批判，像康德和尼采那樣，是TP的一大特性。

TP的腦迴路是什麼樣的？讓我們來看下面的這個例子：一個周六在我們全家出門之前，我發現門邊立著一把傘（摺疊起來並且綁好了），我想起來這是鄰居的傘。當我問「你們誰用史密斯的傘了？」時，我的三個孩子都說沒用。我不服，就問我的INTP兒子（當時8歲），「你把史密斯的傘帶過來了？」他說「是啊。」「我第一次問的時候你怎麼不告訴我？」我問。他回答：「你問我用了沒有，我沒用，我只是帶過來了。」在其他類型那裡你可聽不來這種死摳字眼的回答。

推薦閱讀：