為什麼絕大多數的初級與資深「交互設計師職位」應該消失？

01-24

留個坑，感興趣的同學可以自己試著答一下。

因為不夠專業，貼篇Medium上的文章吧，很多人只是掛著UX/Product Designer頭銜的UI Designer，而一些Interaction Designer甚至連當UI Designer的資格都沒有。

Fire your UX Designer!

1.Does not understand the basics of human cognition, particularly the visual perception aspect of our interaction with our surroundings, and it how it influences the design choices he makes

2.Does not follow any version of an end-to-end (research to ) UX Process

3.Does not get all the stakeholders (upper management, product managers, subordinates, developers, testers, marketing, sales, end-users) on board, right from the beginning, and does not ask for feedback at necessary steps

4.Not a listener, particularly when negative feedback and contradictory opinions are given

5.Doesn』t like to converse with prospective/ active users in finding the root causes

6.Too fixed on design trends and applying them without context

7.Doesn』t know the difference or relationship or history, between modern, simplistic , minimalist and flat design, but will defend either (mostly 『flat』) without understanding its history, concept or context

8.Spends too much time on a single wire-framing concept tinkering spaces and font sizes

9.Starts talking about design styles, typeface choices, color themes etc., way before working out the workflow and interaction design

10.Takes the design outputs personally. Will not be willing to shelve it towards next iteration

11.Doesn"t research anything related to problem area, prospective users, market, competitors, technology etc., maybe except for latest UI trends and submissions

12.Never generates for any form of data at any stage of the UX design process

13.Doesn』t know the difference between Information Architecture and Information Design or Conceptual Model and Mental Model etc.

14.Doesn』t like to sketch to explore or convey ideas

15.Doesn』t give options at any stage for any feature or aspect

16.Knows and talks about Jonathan Ive, Dieter Rams but not Donald Norman, Jared Spool, Jesse James Garret, or Jakob Nielsen etc.

17.Doesn』t know how to apply 『Fitt』s Law』 to interface design

18.Cannot define or quantify usability much less know how to measure it

19.Never tries to document anything at any stage

20.『Card Sorting』 is probably the only usability tool he has heard of

21.Jumps quickly on wire-framing without exploring the problem statement researching for context and setting scope

22.Bleats constantly on consistency! consistency! consistency!

23.Doesn』t understand web technology, device and interface technology

24.Doesn』t understand software development process and its requirements/ constraints

25.Doesn』t know to apply statistics in his design process

26.Does not understand the 『cost』 of his design choices

私以為從來不做用戶調研，只會熟背各種移動端平台設計規範卻不知道規範背後這麼設計的原理，一臉傲嬌地嫌棄PC、Web產品過時不願意做，流程圖/架構圖畫得像模像樣細一看卻邏輯漏洞百出，設計時只會打開Dribbble/Behance和各種競品的界面挑好看的抄抄抄，以為跟上最新設計趨勢就是好設計，卻連『一致性』之外的基本可用性原則都說不上幾條的『交互設計師』，被淘汰並不足為奇。

這個定義得看場景，如果是只有幾個人的創業公司，這種職位確實應該消失。

好像真的應該取消一樣。目前不管國內國外包括蘋果的軟體產品很多都無法讓用戶來用，目前還停留在用戶或者說出錢的人被迫接受設計師垃圾的設計方案的階段。

設計師確實做的不夠好，但因為做的不夠好就取消這個行業這是什麼奇奇怪怪的邏輯啊。行業再進步，初級設計師也在進步，大家都在摸索階段。

初級不懂胡球整，

資深太屌胡球整。