《巴霍巴利王》里的主演都是高種姓貴族嗎？不然他們為什麼可以演王子，國王，太后，王妃諸如此類的角色？

01-16

都說高種姓和低種姓不可以通婚，並且種姓根據膚色就可以分辨，高種姓最明顯的特徵就是皮膚白皙，然而除了女一，男一男二和其他主演一看就會被從高種姓排除了不是嗎~

依據膚色判斷種姓是比較淺顯的，特別是南印度土著多，種姓也沒有北印度這麼嚴格劃分。男一你別看他黑，他是泰盧固raju種姓的，他是高等種姓（剎帝利），他的種姓Raju是有雅利安血統的貴族種姓。另外這部片子是托萊塢的，而托萊塢中佔據主導種姓是首陀羅，其他演員不一定是高種姓。

這是一部南印度的電影，南印度非常炎熱，容易晒黑，而且根據歷史因素，南印度土著很多，當時為了種性制度可以在印度維持，婆羅門也會給南印度的土著地主一些高等種性。所以光用膚色看是不嚴謹的。

印度不同種性是可以通婚的，但女方可以高嫁或者平嫁卻不能低嫁，所以一些低種性的女孩為了改變自己的階級會用高額的嫁妝去吸引那些高種性（婆羅門、剎地利）的男孩，而那些高種性的姑娘為了能讓自己嫁出去會出更多的嫁妝…這是我認為印度嫁女困難的一個原因。

電影里那位太后，種性應該不低，姓克利須那，史詩級神的名字啊。

Dont know who said you upper caste are white and lower caste are black,but this is foolish....baahubali character is played by prabhas his full name is uppalapati prabhas raju....raju in end means his ancestors are rulers and he belong to kshatriya ,a higher caste....even bhalla deva anatagonist role played by Rana daggubaati also belong to higher caste

I would like to make you clear ,this film made in south and south india dont have so much differences in this regard of caste,religion....south india is well developed than north...so your question that if actors are not higher caste they cant play role of king is false and also higher caste are fair is also false....if you see indian kings pics in google most of them are brown(indian colour is not black but brown) and even in baahubali you can see that actors are brown,I think you know difference between black,brown...

This thought you might be getting by seeing bollywood movies which are based on north india and hindi....to make this clear to you bollywood is mostly funded by mafia dons in pakistan,dubai which encourages white,muslim religion,sex...

So most of bollywood heros are white and by seeing that you might thought north indians or high caste are white and others are black but it 10000% false and funny and foolish....there is no so much caste dominance in 2017 in india that makes lower caste for doing role of higher caste roles like king but in this film they are higher caste but its just a coincidence...

And same applies to female too...nothing like higher caste looks fair...indians are brown especially kings...bollywood films for adding glamour used to show indian kings as white because even bollywood historic movies will be love stories but they cant make like baahubali which is made in south and projects facts as truly as possible...

So giving you clarity for question baahubali actors belong to higher caste but there is nothing like only actors of higher caste should act as kings, even lower caste can act and none will object and india dont have so much caste discrimination as you think and all higher castes are not fair and lower castes are not black,there is nothing like exception to females

Finally I want to know whether you chinese like baahubali? Can part 2 get good collection as part1 didnt fo more? It seem to be released on chinese new year...though many are saying baahubali is not famous in china why there are 7200+ ratings before release where only hollywood movies get such before release?

I want to know whether chinese like baahubali and part 2 can do good bussiness and it created any curiosity among chinese after dangal success as baahubali broke dangal record in 5 days

印度「種姓」原本的意思就是膚色。雅利安人在確立這個制度的時候高種姓當然是皮膚白的。但是幾千年的社會變遷很多高種姓的皮膚也變黑了，再嚴密的制度也抵不過時間的變遷。而這部電影是南印度人拍的，南印度幾乎沒有皮膚白的。都是很黑。而女一是北印度人，好像原來在北印發展的不好，在南印度創出名氣的。另外其他角色的扮演者的種姓也不會低，畢竟有資源參見拍電影的至少也是吠舍。