有什麼好的煲機的無損音樂或者音效推薦？
尤其是針對Hifi耳機的
Update 20160414
從20120204到現在一轉眼4年了，陸陸續續的有朋友來點贊，被點贊的頻率也在升高，一定程度上說明大家願意花更多的錢和時間來追求更高的生活品質，這是件好事情。就我個人而言，工作之後心境的變化，新耳機雖然有，卻一直沒有時間去做煲耳機這件事情，反而一直在用2012年的那條耳機，也就是這篇回答中音樂煲過的耳機，熟悉的適合自己的聲音才是最好的。感謝 @先生浩二 整理的歌單。
1，網易雲音樂 聽見好時光
2，網易雲音樂 聽見好時光3，網易雲音樂 聽見好時光4，網易雲音樂 聽見好時光感謝 孤獨貓 整理的歌單。有什麼好的煲機的無損音樂或者音效推薦？ - 孤獨貓的回答再次感謝。
=================個人認為，
所謂的煲耳機 就是在較短的時間內讓耳機中的機械結構老化到一種聽起來比較舒服的程度。通筋活絡這個詞可能會比較形象，也就是讓耳機在每個頻段都能充分表現音樂。耳機如果一上來就聽比較激烈搖滾的歌曲，很容易就讓機械結構由於振幅過大，彈性形變過大，從而導致破音。
煲耳機的目的也就是讓耳機在低中高三個頻段在初期的連續時間內全方位的活動開來，熱身活動做完了，那麼之後無論聽什麼類型音樂的時候也就不會那麼費力了。通常的做法是逐步從輕緩的音樂開始聽，偏低音量連續聽一段時間之後，可以開始聽中頻音樂，聽一段時間之後，聽高頻。低頻時間要遠大於中頻時間，中頻時間大於高頻時間。
也可以把耳機插在收音機上，換到一個全是噪音的台，然後一直聽也可以，白噪音通常包含了常低中高頻段。
煲耳機還是要根據自己的習慣。
蔡琴的渡口 是低頻表現做好的流行樂，低音的各個頻道分布的都很好。建議可以先用渡口煲一段時間。中間穿插一些自己比較喜歡的舒緩音樂。Titanic電影的原聲帶Southampton/The Sinking/Death of Titanic是很好的煲中頻的音樂，中頻分布平均，層次豐富。高頻可以用Vitas的歌劇來煲。另外 加州旅館 也是很好的歌曲，內容豐富，也可以用來一起煲耳機，低中高都可。---------
這是我最近煲耳機的音樂，不專業。其中，粉紅雜訊和白雜訊都是用軟體產生的。
最開始低頻0～12～18小時，音量較小能聽的見，舒服
渡口好久不見+粉紅雜訊+California Hotel中低頻18~24小時，音量偏低
+電台情歌-莫文蔚+陰天-莫文蔚+你是我的眼+天空-王菲
+沒那麼簡單+If I Were A Boy中高頻24～32小時，音量偏低接近正常
渡口California Hotel天空-王菲If I Were A BoyBad dayTitanic - Southampton/The Sinking/Death of TitanicMy Heart Will Go On
+白雜訊+聖誕結32～40小時，音量稍大California HotelTitanic - Southampton/The Sinking/Death of TitanicMy Heart Will Go On陰天+天空-孫燕姿+Without You-Mariah Carey+Tell Me Why-Declan Galbraith
+歌劇-Vitas+情歌-梁靜茹+浮誇-陳奕迅《0-12-18H 低頻 音量較小》http://music.163.com/playlist/363118294/255748207?userid=255748207
《18-24H中低頻 音量偏低》http://music.163.com/playlist/363160052/255748207?userid=255748207《24-32H中高頻 音量偏低接近渡口》http://music.163.com/playlist/363129182/255748207?userid=255748207
《32-40H音量稍大》
http://music.163.com/playlist/363104984/255748207?userid=255748207如果只是用來煲耳機的話，我覺得《黑毒》很不錯
煲機的含義很多，在發燒圈裡小到一根線材、一組腳釘都要煲。（此處請別爭論，只是情節描述，謝謝）
在此我只認為是針對耳機音箱此類揚聲器產品而言的煲機音軌產品。市面上有專門的此類產品，我介紹三個比較知名的以供參考：1、Purist Audio Design"Ultimate" System Enhancer discs
2、ISOTEK Full System Enhancer
該說的理論，該講的常識，前面的大神們都說過了。但我就是我，不一樣的煙火，在煲機這個事情上，我還真是跟大部分人的習慣和看法不太一樣。老規矩，先說結論：
我覺得煲機沒那麼嚴肅，完全可以找一張自己喜歡的碟，享受好的音質，順便煲機。
先說煲機：其實，簡單來說，所謂煲機就是一個硬體的前期預處理，讓它進入狀態，也讓我們提前調整。簡言之，就是會讓聲音更乾淨順滑。
煲機怎麼煲？在我看來，其實只要找一張好點的碟，正常聽就行了，時間長了，聽感也就上去了。那些用粉紅噪音放休放休循環幾次等的方法….在我看來，其實也就是把播放時間集中起來罷了，意義不大。人生苦短啊，我真的不想把大量的屬於耳機的時間，浪費在聽一些美其名曰專門煲機，實則不愛的音樂上。
說完煲機，再來說說推薦的音樂。每當我入手新機，一般是會直接拿喜歡的專輯來聽（如果你要說「煲」也行），當然也必須是音質好，有質感的音樂。就推薦我最喜歡的一張吧：張學友的《張學友·聆聽經典2CD》。
一般來說，面對張學友這樣的實力歌神，大部分人都會覺得他的CD比不上演唱會現場。一方面是受限於錄刻的技術，一方面是因為歌神的現場發揮實在是次次驚艷。不過，這反而是我推薦這張碟的原因之一，因為我覺得這張專輯，是為數不多的能可以跟演唱會效果媲美的。最開始我買這張碟，完全只是因為 「中國DTS音響技術發燒奇蹟」這個說法，作為DTS死忠粉，當然要入手。
作為一個音頻技術控，先說說這張碟採用的技術。這張專輯採用的是DTS 6.1頂級編碼器，據資料描述，是「採用大塊切割的方法將70分鐘的音樂數據以6聲軌壓縮至一張CD光碟中，聲道頻寬、聲道分離度、動態範圍、採樣製作等都是絕對的發燒級別」。什麼意思？通俗地講，就是全方位擴展環繞聲，並且苛刻地保留高清晰、大動態與超寬頻的特色，但同時，又保持人聲的通透度，以及各聲道的清晰度、柔順度、平衡度，現場真實感我打100分！
因為最大程度地還原了現場，因此聽這張專輯的時候，你甚至會覺得比現場聽更細緻。用這張碟煲機的好處在於，比現場安靜，卻又無比地真實。你大可以放心地沉下來聽，所有的細節就在那裡。每首歌的開頭還有一個DTS「炫技」的部分，一小段關乎歌曲內容的立體音效，比如《回頭太難》的馬聲、《分手總要在雨天》的雨聲雷聲…那種真切的感覺，彷彿直接就把你帶進去了那個情境。
而且，即便是最保守的煲機方法，我覺得這張專輯也非常合適，因為它收集了張學友的大多數經典曲目，完美涵蓋了低中高各個音域，比如最耳熟能詳，中高音區的《吻別》，低音的《一路上有你》等等，同時，專輯也沒有過於激烈的曲目，非常符合傳統煲機理念中「打開各個音域」和「不過激」的要求。
說到底，煲機不煲機的，其實都不重要。我只是覺得，既然要聽，就要聽最好的。而在「最好的」這個標準上，我強烈推薦你們先選擇帶有DTS音頻，因為這是音頻品質的保證。然後，再選擇你愛的那張專輯，或是那個歌手。
總而言之，聽哥一句：煲機的效果不是最重要的，享受過程，才是最重要的。
惠威試音碟
那麼多年過去了，還是會有人提出煲耳機/煲音響這個詞，我很佩服發明這個詞的人，是什麼樣的情懷使得「煲」代代相傳。
煲，並不存在，存在的只有腦放。我的淺顯經驗我買的第一條符合Hi-Res標準的耳機是索尼的XBA-A2圈鐵結合耳機，我沒有刻意煲機，而是正常聽，在半年左右我發現了它音質的變化，僅僅圈部分的變化，就是低頻逐漸變多。後來同學入手Z5，低頻也很少，也需要經歷一個漫長的煲機階段。我個人認為沒必要刻意煲機，因為聽你喜歡的歌曲也許會讓你的耳機能夠更好地駕馭你喜歡的歌曲，所以，正常聽就好。如果覺得自己的耳機在某些方面有潛力，卻又發揮不出來的時候，才需要刻意的煲機。比如，你的耳機低頻下潛不錯，但是量少，好像被限制的感覺，你可以嘗試用低頻多的歌曲、正常音量煲一段時間，不用太久，無論你怎麼煲，都要有一個很長的磨合階段的。希望我的回答對你有幫助，也希望更多的朋友指出我的不足或錯誤，謝謝。
事實上，耳機振膜震動的幅度非常非常小。小到肉眼很難分清。而且大耳機的振膜材質沒有那麼脆弱，有的甚至類似於一次性塑料水杯的那種感覺。 基本上很多時候煲機只不過是煲耳朵而已。
甚至於很多人說某某耳塞長時間聽之後和新的耳塞AB對比，發現聲音確實不一樣。 我可以負責任的說：十有八九是因為舊耳塞積灰太多。 任何一個用了很久的耳塞，拆開看看振膜上是不是全是灰？ 尤其是以平頭塞為首。 所以說這種小耳機煲機可以說是幾乎沒有任何用。 如果有聲音有變化。那也只能是變差了。 至於大耳機。呵呵，我不覺得那麼結實的振膜能夠被微小的震動老化，而且別忘了，你的耳機出廠測試的時候可是「沒煲過」的。廠商是覺得參數與音質已經達標才會出廠的，否則不是自砸招牌。！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！重點： 如果幾十個小時的煲機真的有助於改善耳機的音質，那麼廠商一定會在耳機出廠之前進行官方的煲機。！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！因為很多製造領域其實都是這麼乾的。
最後對於某些煲機幾百上千小時的神論。 呵呵，我打賭耳機的設計師都沒聽過煲了上千小時的耳機。煲機確實是營銷玄學，我也用過專用軟體給耳機or音箱煲過機（傻笑） 耳機的使用一開始不滿載（音量最大）就可以了，無損的音樂已經夠好了，貌似現在高品質耳機都做到22wKHz，你可以購買一些sacd或索尼的Hi res，當然要有能播放的設備。 仔細想想因為聲音看不見所以煲機會營銷得如此成功。假如賣你電視電腦告訴你先把它開機耗著之後使用效果更好你會信嗎？ 煲機作為一個挖坑手段確實能讓你更關注它（耳機、音箱）
——————4.25的說明更新———————
經過2個月的完補，本人整理的歌單已與高票答案有了顯著區別。推薦低頻篇的「煲機-舒筋」，每支歌都經精心挑選，希望能對大家有所幫助。——————「煲機」雲歌單如下——————
低頻- 煲機音樂Ⅰ-舒筋： 網易雲音樂 聽見好時光
中低頻-煲機音樂Ⅱ-通絡：網易雲音樂 聽見好時光
高頻-煲機音樂Ⅳ-習武：網易雲音樂 聽見好時光
個人覺得如果不是那種很碉堡的耳機，開始所謂的煲機只需要正常聽一段時間就會好很多，沒有必要專門在各個頻段聽多少個小時。況且自己的中意的耳機就那麼躺在那播放卻不能聽，得多痛苦。
正常聽就好了呀。。雖然爆開理論上表現會更好，不過沒開之前又不是不能聽，多浪費，你買耳機到底為的是聽音樂呢還是僅僅為了聽到好音質？
Received my first ear-over headphone and started to search for expert ideas to make it sound better and after searching through baidu, bing and google and finally this post gave me what I think I should all care about.http://www.wired.com/2013/11/tnhyui-earphone-burn-in/PleaseStop 『Burning In』 Your Earphones
Click to Open Overlay GalleryPhoto: Josh Valcarcel/WIRED
OK, audiophiles: real talk.
Earphone makers seem to be either too polite or scared to say anything.
And the people in the industry who should know better are only actively
encouraging a ritual. So let me say it for them: Earphone burn-in is a
bunch of hokum.
For those of you unfamiliar with the practice, it basically amounts
to pumping different kinds of sound into a new pair of headphones or
earphones for a given period of time. This is to be done before
any critical listening happens. Think of it as the sonic equivalent of
breaking in a new pair of shoes — the idea being that the true character
of your earphones will only surface after some robust exercise. The
only problem? There』s zero evidence this does anything but defer your
enjoyment of music and add more confusion to an already complex topic.
Audiophiles will often apply their own burn-in technique to any
number of music-listening devices: earphones, headphones, amps,
speakers, even cables. With larger headphones, mechanical burn-in is
supposed to describe the gradual settling in of the design parameters of
the cone diaphragms (the things that vibrate back and forth to create
the air pressure changes that we interpret as sound in our ears) into
their intended or optimal state. After this period, proponents claim
they are able to vibrate more freely, thus allowing for better sound.
But wait, there』s more. Optimal burn-in times range from 40 to 400
hours, and the process itself can also take myriad forms. Manufacturers
like Ultrasone offer specific burn-in times for their cans, but others
are happy to leave the details to the true believers. Some of the latter
will simply play music through their phones continuously for a day or
two. Others go with a more comprehensive approach, making elaborate
burn-in mixes and sharing them with others. These can include loops of
pure tones, white noise, sine wave sweeps, and even pink noise. A cult burn-in favorite includes using Lou Reed』s Metal Machine Music,
an album that』s been described as 「the tubular groaning of a galactic
refrigerator.」 Others simply prefer the soothing sound of rain sticks.
To be fair, the physical properties of any mechanical device can and
do change over time. But whether those changes have a perceivable (and
beneficial) effect, that』s another story.
As with many of the numinous subjects in the audiophile realm, this
odd little custom sits squarely at the intersection of psychology,
science, marketing, and that eternally subjective thing known as 「sound
quality.」 And that makes it particularly troublesome.
Matt Engstrom, director of monitoring products at Shure, admits there
is evidence that suggests transducers in larger headphones can
experience burn-in, and that this could, in theory, produce different
sound over time. Again, no one has shown this conclusively, largely
because a) companies aren』t rushing to tell audiophiles they』ve been
wrong all these years and b) there』s no single industry standard for
testing headphones.
This much is known: When it comes to the tiny balanced armatures used
in many earphones, there』s just not the same potential for mechanical
deviation. We』re talking about things the size of a baby』s tooth. And
unlike the large drivers in over-the-ear headphones, there』s just not
that much room for things to change.
Shure has tested some thoroughly used pairs of its E1 earphones,
which first launched in 1997. And guess what? They measure the same now
as when they came off the line. In fact, during the 15 years Shure has
been actively selling earphones, its engineers have reached the same
conclusion again and again: The sound produced by these tiny transducers
during final testing is the same sound you』ll get in a day, in a year,
and in five years… unless something goes wrong.
The company has an even longer history making microphones, which use
the same technology as headphone transducers. 「We』ve got a lot of data
on those over the years, and we』re not convinced on mic burn in either,」
Engstrom says. 「If you think about it, regardless of whether a mic is
plugged in, it』s always hearing, it』s always on. So, in theory, wouldn』t
those drivers always be burning in, and therefore wouldn』t the curve be
very very different over the course of its life?」
It』s not.
Indeed, what keeps this debate going is really the lack of
quantifiable evidence debunking the advantages of burn-in. Well, no one
has disproven it, say audiophiles. Who are we to say what』s going on between between people』s ears, say manufacturers. It』s kind of a Pascal』s Wager for audiophiles: It costs them nothing, it does no harm to the headphones, and you potentially have more to lose not believing in burn-in than you do believing in it.
While some will say all of this harmless, the ambiguity and voodoo
can confuse buyers and quickly turn into a colossal waste of time. The
fact is burn-in has now become tribal knowledge. Read the Amazon
comments on a standard pair of $50 earphones and you』ll probably find
people talking about how long they need to be burned in, and how much
different they sound after 400 hours of pink noise. Then there are
popular websites, which shall remain nameless, that purport to do
rigorous testing on earphones and include burn-in times in their
routines. You might as well be kissing each earpiece 50 times to see
what sonic difference that makes.
Think about it this way: Why would any headphone and earphone
manufacturer design and ship something that』s not already in its optimal
state? People already have enough trouble getting a decent fit
with their earphones (something that really does affect the sound
quality). Then there』s the mind-boggling variation in performance that
comes with the actual music files and equipment you use to listen to
your music.
Indeed, all of this variation gets at the real thing people are
reacting to when they buy new head- and earphones: mental burn-in. If
you』re used to dark-sounding headphones, neutral ones may sound bright
at first until you get used to the new sound. That flexible calibration
is how many of our senses work. Light seems brighter after darkness,
sound rings louder after silence. Chances are, a lot of what people
attribute to headphone burn-in is actually just their brains gradually
becoming used to this new sound or new setting.
So next time you buy a new pair of earphones, try this alternative
ritual: Open the box, remove the earphones, put them in your ears (using
the correct method,
of course), and then start playing music. Like the way they sound?
Great. Keep them. Don』t like it after a day or two? Return 』em. Even if
you brain says otherwise, the sound they produce isn』t going to change.
最自然的方法，就是中等音量隨意聽，雖然效率低，但是溫柔呀~
感覺沒有必要去煲耳機 這感覺有點像是入手件神器不作一下總感覺虧得慌
我自己整理了個50首的歌單,都是些適合邊聽邊煲機的無損音樂。從古箏、小提琴、管弦、鋼琴獨奏到人聲，較為全面。最好刷一遍歌單休息半小時,一天播放不要超過十二小時。大概累計200小時左右就可以了。煲機其實是一門玄學,不用過分拘泥,邊聽邊煲才是最好的方式。,可以嘗試下: 網易雲音樂 聽見好時光
本人不是這個領域的專家也玩得不是很深入。之前的beats入耳式壞掉了，前兩天買了XBA-H1就特別關注了一下這個問題。在鐵三角的官網上看到以下內容，供各位參考。
SHOULD I 『BURN IN』 MY HEADPHONES?
Headphones do not require 『burning』 in, however over a period of time the sound of headphones naturally change by a very small margin.
To make these slight changes happen sooner you can play music through your headphones for 50+ hours at normal listening levels. This 『burning in』 process can have the following effects:
- A smoother frequency extension in the bass and treble
- Better instrument separation
- A more open sound stage
Remember these changes are very slight and would happen naturally in time without 『burning in』 your headphones.
大概翻譯就是，耳機並不需要「煲機」，使用一段時間後耳機的音效會自然地有非常略微的改變。
「煲機」 50個小時以上能夠「輕微」的改變耳機的收聽效果：·在低音和高音頻率變化能夠更加平滑·更容易聽出不同樂器之間的區別·音域更廣參考文章："SHOULD I 『BURN IN』 MY HEADPHONES?" Audio-technica. Audio-technica, n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2016. &PC端有個小軟體mytonetest，可以煲耳機音響什麼的。有粉紅雜訊，同相反相等選擇，還可以選擇煲機時間。非常方便。
收音機搜不到信號的聲音
推薦閱讀：
※用《我的滑板鞋》去煲1000塊錢以上的耳機，是一種怎樣的體驗？
※耳機廠商為什麼不把耳機煲好了再賣？
※如何快速高效地煲耳機？
※為何耳機要「煲」，廠商賣給我們的是半成品嗎，煲耳機科學嗎？