陳建湘是如何走上犯罪道路的？

01-12

陳建湘出事前幾天錄的謝罪視頻

視頻來源於朋友圈，如侵權請告知我刪除。

謝邀.

根據相應資料收集:

陳建湘早些年曾在新化某派出所當過基層民警。「他好像還擔任過該派出所副所長，是一個比較隨和的人，對人很好。」

　　據這位居民介紹，陳建湘在他們轄區派出所工作期間形象非常好，「很願意幫忙，一些東家長西家短的事情麻煩到他，他從來都不會不耐煩，會耐心聽人說完，然後儘力幫助大家，我朋友曾經都麻煩過他。」這名居民表示，陳建湘當時在該地區是公認的好警察，「平時巡邏，也從不偷懶，遇到熟人會主動打招呼。」

　　對於陳建湘近年來的狀況，這名居民表示自己並不清楚，「我認識他的時候，都是7、8年之前了，為什麼他現在會出這樣的事情，我也不知道。但我認識他時，真的是個好警察。」

信息量十分少,且死者並未公開身份,公安殺人本身具有敏感性,作案的動機也尚未明確,目前所知的數據量之少並不能作為分析的依據,等待新消息.

謝謝邀請。

補充一下，以下文字，看懂的自然懂，看不懂的說再多也沒用，到底我說的是反話正話，我自己也搞不懂了……

自感瘋癲，不知所言，謝謝！

第一，槍支彈藥是怎麼來的？

現在槍支管理方面上面要求這麼嚴，他又不是局長，槍是怎麼來的？其所在單位是否嚴格落實上級有關槍支存放、交接等管理環節的相關規定？槍彈分離落實了嗎？雙人雙鎖落實了嗎？單位負責人控制起來了嗎？

如果是管理環節的失誤，其縣公安局局長輕了說辭職，重了說要追究刑事責任。

第二，內部管理幹什麼吃的？思想政治工作到位了嗎？

如果說有精神問題，你內保幹什麼吃的？內部重點人動態管控台賬有嗎？有關於他的記錄嗎？如果沒有，為什麼？是因為他精神沒問題還是內保工作沒到位？

思想政治工作怎麼做的？有沒有民警談心記錄？記錄中有沒有其思想偏激、拗執的體現？他最近有沒有什麼家庭變故或者足以影響情緒的事情？如果有，後期工作是怎麼做的？有沒有進行心理干預？心理干預前是不是對其採取了有效措施，比如停止執行職務或者停止配槍資格？

第三，他為什麼要殺人？

他殺的或者揚言要殺的人和他有什麼仇恨？這個梁子又是什麼時候結下的？是激情還是積怨？或者積壓太多，非一日之寒？那麼壓垮他的最後一根稻草又是什麼？

對於一個客觀的人，上面東西都摸清了，才能告訴你他是怎麼走向犯罪道路的……

是什麼讓一個老民警端起了槍？希望真實公開作案動機。

Zersetzung （德語，不同的翻譯有：分解，腐蝕，暗中破壞，生物降解或溶解）是一種東德秘密警察斯塔西的心理技巧，用來壓制政治對手。這種「Zersetzung措施」在一本1976年的關於警察程序的指令框架中有所定義，在所謂「作戰程序」的背景中使用。它們取代了烏布利希時代（Walter Ulbricht）的全面恐怖。Zersetzung壓迫的實際操作由大量控制和心理操縱的秘密方法構成，操作對象包括目標的個人關係，為了實現這些操作，斯塔西依賴於它的非正式合作者網路（線人網路）、凌駕於各機構之上的國家權力以及作戰心理學。斯塔西利用定向的心理攻擊設法剝奪持異議者任何「敵對行動」的機會。由於東德轉變之後眾多斯塔西文件的出版，Zersetzung的使用得到充分證實。大約數千或者10,000人是Zersetzung的受害者，其中5,000人遭受了不可逆性損傷。德國為這些受害者設立了補償性養老金。定義斯塔西，或者全稱國家安全部（德語：Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, MfS）在它1985年的政治特工詞典中是這樣定義Zersetzung的: 「... 為了有效地與顛覆活動作鬥爭，國家安全部所採用的一種操作方法，尤其是用於操作治療。利用Zersetzung可以影響經營不同政治活動的消極敵對的個人，特別是他們傾向和信仰的消極敵對的方面，因此這些人被拋棄並且一點一點改變，同時，如果適用的話，敵對消極勢力之間的矛盾和差異將會被會打開、利用和加強。 Zersetzung的目的是分裂、癱瘓、瓦解和孤立敵對消極勢力，是為了預防性地阻礙敵對消極活動，為了極大限制或者完全制止他們，並且如果適用的話，為一次政治和意識形態的重建準備場地。 Zersetzung相當於「作戰程序」和其它阻礙敵對集會的預防活動的一個直接構成元素。執行Zersetzung的主力軍是非官方合作者（線人）。實施Zersetzung的前提是計劃、準備、完成敵對活動的信息和重要證據，也包括Zersetzung的切入點。 Zersetzung必須是建立在事實的根源分析和具體目標的精確定義的基礎上的。Zersetzung必須以一種統一的受監督的方式執行，它的結果必須記錄下來。 Zersetzung的政治爆炸力提高了保密工作的要求。」政治背景德意志民主共和國（GDR 民主德國）在它存在的第一個10年里主要通過刑法壓制政治反對派，指控他們煽動戰爭或者號召抵制。為了抵消1963年修建柏林牆導致的國際孤立，民主德國終止了司法恐怖。特別是從1971年埃里希·昂納克時代（Erich Honecker）開始，斯塔西加緊了它拋開刑法懲罰異議分子行為的努力。關鍵動機是民主德國渴望國際認可，並且在1960年代末它渴望同西德改善關係。實際上民主德國致力於遵守聯合國憲章和赫爾辛基協議，也包括1972年同聯邦德國簽訂的基本條約，為了尊重人權，或者至少是表達這樣的意圖。德國統一社會黨政權（東德政權）因此決定減少政治犯數量，實行不需要監禁或法庭判決的鎮壓作為補償。實際操作斯塔西本質上把Zersetzung作為一種心理壓迫和迫害的手段。它把作戰心理學的研究成果配置進斯塔西法學院的方法中，並應用到政治對手身上，意圖暗中削弱他們的自信和自尊。它設計Zersetzung行動，使目標遭遇反覆失望來恐嚇和動搖他們，通過干涉和破壞他們同他人的關係來使他們在社會上受到孤立，就如同是社會阻抑（social undermining）。斯塔西實施Zersetzung的目的是為了引發受害者的個人危機，使他們過於灰心喪氣和心理苦惱以至於沒有時間和精力來進行反政府活動。斯塔西故意隱藏他們作為行動策劃者的角色。作家Jürgen Fuchs是Zersetzung的受害者，他寫了自己的經歷，其中他用「心理犯罪」和「一種針對人類靈魂的攻擊」來形容斯塔西的所作所為。儘管Zersetzung技巧在1950年代末已在事實上確立，但直到1970年代中期才以科學方法的形式定義下來，而且只有到1970年代和1980年代那時才開始系統地實施。很難確定有多少人被盯上，因為資料已經過相當大程度的、刻意的編輯掩蓋；然而，眾所周知的是，Zersetzung的手段在一定範圍內變化，有很多不同部門實施它們。總的來說，存在這樣一個比例，即每個被盯上的團體有4名或5名授權的Zersetzung操作員，每個被盯上的人有3名操作員。一些資料表明Zersetzung的「長期受害者」大約有5,000人。在斯塔西研究法學的學院里，發表的以Zersetzung為主題的論文數量是兩位數。它也有一本50頁的Zersetzung綜合教學手冊，其中包含眾多斯塔西的實踐案例。實施機構幾乎所有斯塔西部門都參與了Zersetzung 行動，儘管斯塔西的柏林XX指揮部和地區及市政府分部辦事處的領導是首要的。斯塔西首腦和XX營的職能是保持對宗教社團、文化與媒體機構、其它政黨、民主德國很多隸屬於執政黨的大規模社會組織、體育、教育和衛生機構的監視 – 有效覆蓋公民生活的所有方面。斯塔西利用了東德封閉的社會系統內部可供他們使用的手段，並把它的行為作為東德封閉社會系統環境的一部分。一個已建立的、有政治目的的合作網路為斯塔西提供了大量機會介入諸如制裁專業人士和學生這樣的事情：把他們從協會和運動俱樂部中開除，偶爾讓人民警察（Volkspolizei民主德國的准軍事國家警察）拘捕他們，也安排拒絕發放他們去社會主義國家的旅行許可，或者安排在不需要簽證的捷克斯洛伐克和波蘭邊境入境處拒絕給他們放行。各種各樣的合作者包括地方政府分支機構、大學、職業管理機構、住房管理機構、公共儲蓄銀行以及在一些案例中的主管醫師。斯塔西的三線（觀察）、26營（電話和房屋監視）和M（郵政通信）部門為Zersetzung 手法設計提供了必要的背景信息，而32營則設法獲取所需要的技術。斯塔西與其它東方陣營國家的特務機關合作實施Zersetzung。舉個例子，斯塔西在1960年代早期與波蘭特務機關合作對付耶和華見證會（Jehovah"s Witnesses）組織的分會，這在後來被稱為「內部Zersetzung」（內部顛覆）。對付個人斯塔西在（持異議者的）活動前、活動中、活動後都會應用Zersetzung，或者以此替代監禁來懲罰被盯上的人。一般而言，「作戰程序」的目的不是為了收集證據控告目標，也不是為了能夠開啟刑事訴訟程序。斯塔西更喜歡把「Zersetzung措施」在某種程度上視作一種不方便利用司法程序時所使用的手段，或者為了諸如民主德國國際形象這樣的政治理由。在某些情況下，斯塔西試圖故意引誘某個個體犯罪，例如Wolf Biermann（前東德詩人、創作型歌手）的情況：斯塔西用未成年人陷害他，希望他經不起誘惑，這樣的話他們就能對他提起刑事指控。他們研究的用於這種指控的罪行是非政治的，例如持有毒品，毒品走私或者販賣，盜竊，金融詐騙，以及強姦。經證實的Zersetzung形式在1/76號指令中有所描述：有系統地貶低目標的名聲、形象和聲譽，所用的信息資料一部分是真實的、可驗證的和丟人的，而另一部分是假的、貌似可信的、難以反駁的以及同樣丟人的；有系統地安排目標在社會和職業上的失敗，目的是摧毀個人自信；[...] 激發對未來看法的懷疑；激發團體內的不信任和相互懷疑[...]；設置空間和臨時障礙使得團體成員不能或者至少很難相互聯繫[...]，比如[...]指派遙遠的工作地。 —1976年1月「作戰程序」發展第1/76號指令以間諜活動收集的情報為基礎，斯塔西建立了「社會關係圖」和「心理特徵圖」，並將其應用於Zersetzung的心理形式。他們利用個人特點，例如同性戀，也包括被盯人所應有的性格弱點 — 比如職業失敗，父母失職，色情興趣，離婚，酗酒，依賴藥物，犯罪傾向，對某種收集或遊戲的熱情，或者與極右圈子有聯繫 — 或者甚至是對傾倒在熟人圈裡的謠言感覺羞恥的掩飾。在斯塔西看來，Zersetzung措施和個性相結合是最有效果的；必須避免全部「照搬照抄」。此外，Zersetzung方法包括公開的、隱藏的和偽裝的間諜活動；拆信和竊聽電話；侵犯私人財產；操縱車輛；以及甚至給食物下毒和使用假藥。某些斯塔西的合作者（線人）默認了Zersetzung受害者的自殺。還不能完全確定斯塔西利用X射線引起它對手的長期健康問題。即便如此，Rudolf Bahro、Gerulf Pannach和Jürgen Fuchs三個重要的異議人士同時受到監禁，在兩年的時間間隔內都死於癌症。與此同時，前民主德國斯塔西檔案聯邦委員會（BStU）的一項研究根據現存文件否認了像冒用X射線的這樣的情況，並且只提到放射源孤立的無心的有害使用，例如為了標記文件。斯塔西在目標毫不知情的情況下用目標的名義訂購產品、撥打急救電話來恐嚇他/她。為了威脅、恐嚇目標或者使目標得精神病，斯塔西確保自己能進入目標的住宅，並且通過添加、去除和修改物品來留下它出現過的可見痕迹。對付團體和社會關係斯塔西通過匿名的信件、電報和電話來操縱友情、愛情、婚姻及家庭的關係，也包括用令人難堪的照片，方式方法經常改變。用這種方式，父母和子女通常會有條不紊地按步驟相互變成陌生人。為了挑撥衝突和婚外情，斯塔西會安排特工進行色誘。對於團體Zersetzung，斯塔西利用非官方合作者（線人）滲透團體，有時候也會利用未成年人。反對派團體的工作受到永久反對提議的阻礙，而且當要做決定時，和非官方合作者這一方無法達成一致。為了在團體內部播下不信任的種子，斯塔西使人相信某些成員是非官方合作者；而且斯塔西還通過散布謠言和操縱照片偽造與『非官方合作者』的不慎重舉動，或者把目標團體的成員安置在行政職位使人相信這是非官方合作者活動的一種獎勵。他們甚至通過賦予特權來喚起對某些成員的懷疑，例如住房或私家車。此外，只監禁某些團體成員也會產生懷疑。措施的目標群體斯塔西對個人和團體使用Zersetzung手段。民主德國的反對派有很多不同的來源，所以沒有特別相同的目標團體。因此Zersetzung的策略計劃會根據每個可知威脅的情況分別進行調整適應。不過斯塔西仍然定義了幾個主要目標團體： · 申請集體簽證國外旅行的協會 · 批判政府的藝術家團體 · 宗教反對派團體 · 青年亞文化團體 · 支持以上團體的團體（人權與和平組織，那些輔助非法出境和叛逃活動的團體）斯塔西也會偶爾利用Zersetzung對付那些被視為有害的非政治組織，例如望台協會（Watchtower Society）。被Zersetzung行動盯上的名人包括Jürgen Fuchs, Gerulf Pannach, Rudolf Bahro, Robert Havemann, Rainer Eppelmann, Reiner Kunze, Gerd 和 Ulrike Poppe夫婦, 以及 Wolfgang Templin。社會和司法過程民主德國反對者Wolfgang Templin在意識到自己被盯上了之後，試圖使西方記者注意到斯塔西Zersetzung活動的細節。1977年《明鏡周刊》發表了分成5部分的一系列文章，「你會裂開！」，流亡人士Jürgen Fuchs在文章中這樣描述斯塔西的「作戰心理學」。斯塔西試圖抹黑Fuchs及相似文章的內容，輪番報道稱Fuchs對其職能有一種妄想症的觀點，意圖使《明鏡周刊》和其它媒體認為他正患有一種迫害情結。然而，斯塔西的辯解卻被斯塔西自己的官方文檔所駁斥，這些文檔在東德巨變後接受了檢查。因為東德的一般人群和東德之外的人並不知道Zersetzung的本質和範圍，所以那些受Zersetzung影響的人對斯塔西惡毒手段的揭露遭到一定程度的懷疑。很多人至今仍表示無法理解斯塔西的合作者怎麼會參與如此不人道的行動。由於「法無明文規定者不為罪」的原則，即使在1990年後，Zersetzung在整體上仍然沒有被視為非法，法庭無法對參與計劃和實施Zersetzung的行為採取行動。因為Zersetzung作為一種犯罪的具體法律定義不存在，只能報告一些這種手段的個人案例。即使是根據民主德國的法律，為了避免限制條款的情形，侵犯行為需要在其行使之後馬上向民主德國當局報告。很多受害者經歷了額外的困難，即斯塔西並沒有被認定是個人傷害和不幸的始作俑者。記載Zersetzung方法的官方文檔常常在法庭上無效，而且斯塔西銷毀了很多詳述Zersetzung實際執行的文件。根據1990年康復法案中第17章a項的條款，Zersetzung操作的倖存者沒有接受經濟補償的資格，除非他們曾被拘留過至少180天。可證實的因被斯塔西作為目標受到系統性影響而導致職業相關損失和/或健康損害的案例，可以通過一部涉及解決侵權的法律追究，和根據行政法提出職業康復或康復的訴求一樣。這些法律規定推翻了民主德國政府機構的某些行政規章並且證明它們違反憲法。這符合1950年戰爭受害者救濟法案中詳細規定的社會平衡支付的條件。養老保險金和收入損失的平衡支付也適用於受持續迫害至少三年並且訴求者能夠證明有必要的案例。然而，以上例子中，無論是提供斯塔西侵蝕受害者健康、私人財產、教育和職業領域的證據，還是得到斯塔西應該對Zersetzung操作直接造成的個人損害（包括精神傷害）負責的官方承認，受害者已經歷過的種種困難依然在阻礙著他們尋求正義。技巧在現代的使用俄羅斯秘密警察FSB（俄羅斯聯邦安全局）據報道稱使用聚眾圍攻（mobbing）的技巧對付外國外交官和記者。2015年6月，Glenn Greenwald出版的NSA（美國國家安全局）文件披露英國情報機構GCHQ 的JTRIG 團體隱蔽地操縱網上社區。這與JTRIG 的目標一致：通過敗壞他們名聲來「破壞、否認、貶低和瓦解」敵人，植入虛假信息以及關閉他們的通訊交流。 See also 請參閱 Mobbing 聚眾圍攻 Destabilisation 擾動 Gaslighting 煤氣燈操作 Mind control 精神控制 Microaggression theory 微攻擊理論 Mind games 心理遊戲 Power and control in abusive relationships 虐待關係中的權力和控制 Psychological warfare 心理戰 Stasi#Zersetzung 斯塔西#Zersetzung COINTELPRO 反情報程序 Joint Threat Intelligence Research Group 共同威脅情報研究組拓展閱讀 Annie Ring. After the Stasi: Collaboration and the Struggle for Sovereign Subjectivity in the Writing of German Unification. 280 pages, Bloomsbury Academic (October 22, 2015) ISBN 1472567609. Max Hertzberg. Stealing the Future (The East Berlin Series) (Book 1), 242 pages, Wolf Press (August 8, 2015), ISBN 0993324703. Josie McLellan. Love in the Time of Communism: Intimacy and Sexuality in the GDR. 250 pages, CambridgeUniversity Press (October 17, 2011), ISBN 0521727618 附原文： Zersetzung From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung Zersetzung (German; variously translated as decomposition, corrosion, undermining, biodegradation or dissolution) was a psychological technique of the East German secret police, the Stasi, and was used to silence political opponents. The "measures of Zersetzung", defined in the framework of a directive on police procedures in 1976,[1] were used in the context of so-called "operational procedures" (in German Operative Vorg?nge or OV). They replaced the overt terror of the Ulbricht era. The practice of repression in Zersetzung comprised extensive and secret methods of control and psychological manipulation, including personal relationships of the target, for which the Stasi relied on its network of informal collaborators,[2] (in German inoffizielle Mitarbeiter or IM), the State"s power over institutions, and on operational psychology. Using targeted psychological attacks the Stasi tried to deprive a dissident of any chance of a "hostile action". The use of Zersetzung is well documented due to numerous Stasi files published after East Germany"s Wende. Several thousands or up to 10,000 individuals are estimated to have become victims[3]:217 5,000 of whom sustained irreversible damage.[4] Pensions for restitution have been created for the victims. Definition The Stasi, or Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, MfS) by its full name, defined Zersetzung in its 1985 dictionary of political operatives as "...a method of operation by the Ministry for State Security for an efficacious struggle against subversive activities, particularly in the treatment of operations. With Zersetzung one can influence hostile and negative individuals across different operational political activities, especially the hostile and negative aspects of their dispositions and beliefs, so these are abandoned and changed little by little, and, if applicable, the contradictions and differences between the hostile and negative forces would be laid open, exploited, and reinforced. The goal of Zersetzung is the fragmentation, paralysis, disorganization, and isolation of the hostile and negative forces, in order to preventatively impede the hostile and negative activities, to largely restrict, or to totally avert them, and if applicable to prepare the ground for a political and ideological reestablishment. Zersetzung is equally an immediate constitutive element of "operational procedures" and other preventive activities to impede hostile gatherings. The principal forces to execute Zersetzung are the inofficial collaborators. Zersetzung presupposes information and significant proof of hostile activities planned, prepared, and accomplished as well as anchor points corresponding to measures of Zersetzung. Zersetzung must be produced on the basis of a root cause analysis of the facts and the exact definition of a concrete goal. Zersetzung must be executed in a uniform and supervised manner; its results must be documented. The political explosive force of Zersetzung heightens demands regarding the maintenance of secrecy."[5] Political context During its first decade of existence the German Democratic Republic (GDR) subdued political opposition primarily through the penal code, by accusing them of incitement to war or of calls of boycott.[6] To counteract the international isolation of the GDR due to the construction of the Berlin wall in 1963, judicial terror was abandoned.[7] Since the debut of the Erich Honecker era in 1971 in particular, the Stasi intensified its efforts to punish dissident behaviors without using the penal code.[8] Important motives were the GDR"s desire for international recognition and rapprochementwith West Germany at the end of the 1960s. In fact the GDR was committed to adhere to the U.N. Charter[9] and the Helsinki accords[10] as well as theBasic Treaty, 1972 signed with the Federal Republic of Germany,[11] to respect human rights, or at least it announced its intention as such. The regime of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany thus decided to reduce the number of political prisoners, which was compensated for by practicing repression without imprisonment or court judgements.[12][13] In practice The Stasi used Zersetzung essentially as a means of psychological oppression and persecution.[14] Findings of operational psychology,[15] were formulated into method at the Stasi"s College of Law (Juristische Hochschule der Staatssicherheit, or JHS), and applied to political opponents in an effort to undermine their self-confidence and self-esteem. Operations were designed to intimidate and destabilise them by subjecting them to repeated disappointment, and to socially alienate them by interfering with and disrupting their relationships with others as in social undermining. The aim was to induce personal crises in victims, leaving them too unnerved and psychologically distressed to have the time and energy for anti-government activism.[16] The Stasi intentionally concealed their role as mastermind of the operations.[17][18] Author Jürgen Fuchs was a victim of Zersetzung and wrote about his experience, describing the Stasi"s actions as 「psychosocial crime」, and 「an assault on the human soul」.[16] Although its techniques had been established effectively by the late 1950s, Zersetzung was not defined in terms of a scientific method until the mid-1970s, and only then began to be carried out in a systematic manner in the 1970s and 1980s.[19] It is difficult to determine how many people were targeted, since the sources have been deliberately and considerably redacted; it is known, however, that tactics varied in scope, and that a number of different departments implemented them. Overall there was a ratio of four or five authorised Zersetzung operators for each targeted group, and three for each individual.[20] Some sources indicate that around 5,000 people were 「persistently victimised」 by Zersetzung.[4] At the College of Legal Studies, the number of dissertations submitted on the subject of Zersetzung was in double figures.[21] It also had a comprehensive 50-page Zersetzung teaching manual, which included numerous examples of its practice.[22] Implementing institutions Almost all Stasi departments were involved in Zersetzung operations, although first and foremost the lead of the Stasi"s directorate XX (Hauptabteilung XX) in Berlin, and its divisional offices in regional and municipal government. The function of the head and Abteilung XXs was to maintain surveillance of religious communities; cultural and media establishments; alternative political parties; the GDR"s many political establishment-affiliated mass social organisations; sport; and education and health services - effectively covering all aspects of civic life.[23]The Stasi made use of the means available to them within, and as a circumstance of, the GDR"s closed social system. An established, politically motivated collaborative network (politisch-operatives Zusammenwirken, or POZW) provided them with extensive opportunities for interference in such situations as the sanctioning of professionals and students, expulsion from associations and sports clubs, and occasional arrests by the Volkspolizei[17] (the GDR"s quasi-military national police). Refusal of permits for travel to socialist states, or denial of entry at Czechoslovakian and Polish border crossings where no visa requirement existed, were also arranged. The various collaborators (Partnern des operativen Zusammenwirkens) included branches of regional government, university and professional management, housing administrative bodies, the Sparkassepublic savings bank, and in some cases head physicians.[24] The Stasi"s Linie III (Observation), Abteilung 26 (Telephone and room surveillance) and M(Postal communications) departments provided essential background information for the designing of Zersetzung techniques, with Abteilung 32 procuring the required technology.[25] The Stasi collaborated with the secret services of other Eastern Bloc countries to implement Zersetzung. One such example was the Polish secret services co-operating against branches of the Jehovah"s Witnesses organisation in the early 1960s, which would come to be known[26] as "innere Zersetzung"[27] (internal subversion). Against individuals The Stasi applied Zersetzung before, during, after, or instead of incarcerating the targeted individual. The "operational procedures" did not have as an aim, in general, to gather evidence for charges against the target, or to be able to begin criminal prosecutions. The Stasi considered the "measures of Zersetzung" rather in part as an instrument that was used when judiciary procedures were not convenient, or for political reasons such as the international image of the GDR.[28][29] In certain cases, the Stasi attempted meanwhile to knowingly inculpate an individual, as for example in the case of Wolf Biermann: The Stasi set him up with minors, hoping that he would allow himself to be seduced, and that they could then pursue criminal charges.[30] The crimes that they researched for such accusations were non-political, as for example drug possession, trafficking in customs or currencies, theft, financial fraud, and rape.[31] The proven forms of Zersetzung are described in the directive 1/76: a systematic degradation of reputation, image, and prestige in a database on one part true, verifiable and degrading, and on the other part false, plausible, irrefutable, and always degrading; a systematic organization of social and professional failures for demolishing the self-confidence of the individual; [...] stimulation of doubts with respect to perspectives on the future; stimulation of mistrust or mutual suspicion among groups [...]; putting in place spatial and temporal obstacles rendering impossible or at least difficult the reciprocal relations of a group [...], for example by [...] assigning distant workplaces. —Directive No. 1/76 of January 1976 for the development of "operational procedures".[33] Beginning with intelligence obtained by espionage, the Stasi established "sociograms" and "psychograms" which it applied for the psychological forms of Zersetzung. They exploited personal traits, such as homosexuality, as well as supposed character weaknesses of the targeted individual — for example a professional failure, negligence of parental duties, pornographic interests, divorce, alcoholism, dependence on medications, criminal tendencies, passion for a collection or a game, or contacts with circles of the extreme right — or even the veil of shame from the rumors poured out upon one"s circle of acquaintances.[34][35] From the point of view of the Stasi, the measures were the most fruitful when they were applied in connection with a personality; all "schematism" had to be avoided.[34] Moreover, methods of Zersetzung included espionage, overt, hidden, and feigned; opening letters and listening to telephone calls; encroachments on private property; manipulation of vehicles; and even poisoning food and using false medications.[36] Certain collaborators of the Stasi tacitly took into account the suicide of victims of Zersetzung.[37] It has not been definitely established that the Stasi used x-rays to provoke long-term health problems in its opponents.[38] That said, Rudolf Bahro, Gerulf Pannach, and Jürgen Fuchs, three important dissidents who had been imprisoned at the same time, died of cancer within an interval of two years.[39] A study by the Federal Commissioner for the Records of the State Security Service of the former GDR (Bundesbeauftragte für die Unterlagen des Staatssicherheitsdienstes der ehemaligen Deutschen Demokratischen Republik or BStU) has meanwhile rejected on the basis of extant documents such as fraudulent use of x-rays, and only mentions isolated and unintentional cases of the harmful use of sources of radiation, for example to mark documents.[40] In the name of the target, the Stasi made little announcements, ordered products, and made emergency calls, to terrorize him/her.[41][42] To threaten or intimidate or cause psychoses the Stasi assured itself of access to the target"s living quarters and left visible traces of its presence, by adding, removing, and modifying objects.[31] Against groups and social relations The Stasi manipulated relations of friendship, love, marriage, and family by anonymous letters, telegrams and telephone calls as well as compromising photos, often altered.[43] In this manner, parents and children were supposed to systematically become strangers to one another.[44] To provoke conflicts and extramarital relations the Stasi put in place targeted seductions by Romeo agents.[30] For the Zersetzung of groups, it infiltrated them with unofficial collaborators, sometimes minors.[45] The work of opposition groups was hindered by permanent counter-propositions and discord on the part of unofficial collaborators when making decisions.[46] To sow mistrust within the group, the Stasi made believe that certain members were unofficial collaborators; moreover by spreading rumors and manipulated photos,[47] the Stasi feigned indiscretions with unofficial collaborators, or placed members of targeted groups in administrative posts to make believe that this was a reward for the activity of an unofficial collaborator.[30] They even aroused suspicions regarding certain members of the group by assigning privileges, such as housing or a personal car.[30] Moreover, the imprisonment of only certain members of the group gave birth to suspicions.[46] Target groups for measures The Stasi used Zersetzung tactics on individuals and groups. There was no particular homogeneous target group, as opposition in the GDR came from a number of different sources. Tactical plans were thus separately adapted to each perceived threat.[48] The Stasi nevertheless defined several main target groups:[17] · associations of people making collective visa applications for travel abroad · artists" groups critical of the government · religious opposition groups · youth subculture groups · groups supporting the above (human rights and peace organisations, those assisting illegal departure from the GDR, and expatriate and defector movements). The Stasi also occasionally used Zersetzung on non-political organisations regarded as undesirable, such as the Watchtower Society.[49] Prominent individuals targeted by Zersetzung operations included Jürgen Fuchs, Gerulf Pannach, Rudolf Bahro, Robert Havemann, Rainer Eppelmann,Reiner Kunze, husband and wife Gerd and Ulrike Poppe, and Wolfgang Templin. Social and juridicial process Once aware of his own status as a target, GDR opponent Wolfgang Templin tried, with some success, to bring details of the Stasi"s Zersetzungactivities to the attention of western journalists.[50] In 1977 Der Spiegel published a five-part article series, 「Du sollst zerbrechen!」 ("You"re going to crack!"), by the exiled Jürgen Fuchs, in which he describes the Stasi"s 「operational psychology」. The Stasi tried to discredit Fuchs and the contents of similar articles, publishing in turn claims that he had a paranoid view of its function,[51] and intending that Der Spiegel and other media would assume he was suffering from a persecution complex.[50][52] This, however, was refuted by the official Stasi documents examined after Die Wende (the political power shift in the GDR in 1989-90). Because the scale and nature of Zersetzung were unknown both to the general population of the GDR and to people abroad, revelations of the Stasi"s malicious tactics were met with some degree of disbelief by those affected.[53] Many still nowadays express incomprehension at how the Stasi"s collaborators could have participated in such inhuman actions.[53] Since Zersetzung as a whole, even after 1990, was not deemed to be illegal because of the principle of nulla poena sine lege (no penalty without law), actions against involvement in either its planning or implementation were not enforceable by the courts.[54] Because this specific legal definition of Zersetzung as a crime didn"t exist,[55] only individual instances of its tactics could be reported. Acts which even according to GDR law were offences (such as the violation of Briefgeheimnis, the secrecy of correspondence) needed to have been reported to the GDR authorities soon after having been committed in order not to be subject to a statute of limitations clause.[56] Many of the victims experienced the additional complication that the Stasi was not identifiable as the originator in cases of personal injury and misadventure. Official documents in whichZersetzung methods were recorded often had no validity in court, and the Stasi had many files detailing its actual implementation destroyed.[57] Unless they had been detained for at least 180 days, survivors of Zersetzung operations, in accordance with §17a of a 1990 rehabilitation act (theStrafrechtlichen Rehabilitierungsgesetzes, or StrRehaG), are not eligible for financial compensation. Cases of provable, systematically effected targeting by the Stasi, and resulting in employment-related losses and/or health damage, can be pursued under a law covering settlement of torts (Unrechtsbereinigungsgesetz, or 2. SED-UnBerG) as claims either for occupational rehabilitation or rehabilitation under administrative law. These overturn certain administrative provisions of GDR institutions and affirm their unconstitutionality. This is a condition for the social equalisation payments specified in the Bundesversorgungsgesetz (the war victims relief act of 1950). Equalisation payments of pension damages and for loss of earnings can also be applied for in cases where victimisation continued for at least three years, and where claimants can prove need.[58] The above examples of seeking justice have, however, been hindered by various difficulties victims have experienced, both in providing proof of the Stasi"s encroachment into the areas of health, personal assets, education and employment, and in receiving official acknowledgement that the Stasi was responsible for personal damages (including psychic injury) as a direct result of Zersetzung operations.[59] Modern use of techniques Russia"s secret police, the FSB, has been reported to use mobbing techniques against foreign diplomats and journalists.[60] In June 2015, NSA files published by Glenn Greenwald revealed details of the JTRIG group at British intelligence agency GCHQ covertly manipulating online communities.[61]This is in line with JTRIG"s goal: to "destroy, deny, degrade [and] disrupt" enemies by "discrediting" them, planting misinformation and shutting down their communications.[62] See also Mobbing Destabilisation Gaslighting Mind control Microaggression theory Mind games Power and control in abusive relationships Psychological warfare Stasi#Zersetzung COINTELPRO Joint Threat Intelligence Research Group Further reading Annie Ring. After the Stasi: Collaboration and the Struggle for Sovereign Subjectivity in the Writing of German Unification. 280 pages, Bloomsbury Academic (October 22, 2015) ISBN 1472567609. Max Hertzberg. Stealing the Future (The East Berlin Series) (Book 1), 242 pages, Wolf Press (August 8, 2015), ISBN 0993324703. Josie McLellan. Love in the Time of Communism: Intimacy and Sexuality in the GDR. 250 pages, CambridgeUniversity Press (October 17, 2011), ISBN 0521727618 發佈於 2017-06-11 著作權歸作者所有 ——————————————— the Stasi often used a method which was really diabolic. It was called Zersetzung, and it"s described in another guideline. The word is difficult to translate because it means originally "biodegradation". But actually, it"s a quite accurate description. The goal was to destroy secretly the self-confidence of people, for example by damaging their reputation, by organizing failures in their work, and by destroying their personal relationships. Considering this, East Germany was a very modern dictatorship. The Stasi didn"t try to arrest every dissident. It preferred to paralyze them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and to so many institutions. —Hubertus Knabe, German historian …斯塔西（前東德秘密警察組織）經常使用一種非常毒辣的方法。它叫做Zersetzung，在另一個章節有所描述。這個詞很難翻譯，因為它原來的意思是「生物降解」。但是實際上，這是一個相當精確的描述。這種方法的目的是秘密地摧毀人們的自信，比如通過損害他們的名譽，在他們工作中（故意）安排失敗，破壞他們的個人關係來實現這個目的。考慮到這個，東德是一個非常現代的獨裁國家。斯塔西沒有嘗試逮捕所有不同意見者，它更喜歡癱瘓他們，它之所以能這麼做是因為它可以利用如此之多的個人信息和如此之多的機構。 —Hubertus Knabe, 德國歷史學家 The Stasi perfected the technique of psychological harassment of perceived enemies known as Zersetzung– a term borrowed from chemistry which literally means "decomposition". 斯塔西完善了這種對已知敵人心理騷擾的技術，叫做Zersetzung，一個借自化學的術語，字面上的意思是「分解」。 By the 1970s, the Stasi had decided that the methods of overt persecution that had been employed up to that time, such as arrest and torture, were too crude and obvious. It was realised that psychological harassment was far less likely to be recognised for what it was, so its victims, and their supporters, were less likely to be provoked into active resistance, given that they would often not be aware of the source of their problems, or even its exact nature. Zersetzung was designed to side-track and "switch off" perceived enemies so that they would lose the will to continue any "inappropriate" activities. 到20世紀70年代，斯塔西已經認識到那些沿用至今的公開迫害的方法過於粗糙和明顯，比如逮捕和酷刑。它意識到比起過去的方法，心理騷擾被識別出真面目的可能性遠遠要低，因此心理騷擾的受害者及他們的支持者被挑動產生積極抵抗的可能性也遠低得多，因為受害者常常不會意識到他們問題的源頭，或者甚至沒意識到它真正的本質。Zersetzung被設計用於誤導（side-track）和「關閉」已知敵人，這樣他們就會失去繼續從事「不當」活動的意志。 Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim"s private or family life. This often included psychological attacks, such as breaking into homes and subtly manipulating the contents, in a form of gaslighting – moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with another. Other practices included property damage, sabotage of cars, purposely incorrect medical treatment, smear campaigns including sending falsified compromising photos or documents to the victim"s family, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, bugging, mysterious phone calls or unnecessary deliveries, even including sending a vibrator to a target"s wife. Usually, victims had no idea that the Stasi were responsible. Many thought that they were losing their minds, and mental breakdowns and suicide could result. Zersetzung之下採用的戰術一般包括破壞受害者的私人或家庭生活。這常常包括心理攻擊，例如闖入家中，巧妙地操縱內容，用一種操縱現實感知（gaslighting）的形式 - 移動傢具，改變鬧鐘定時，把圖畫從牆上拿掉或者換一幅（variety of tea with another）。其它活動包括毀壞地產，破壞車輛，蓄意錯誤的醫療，詆毀活動包括發送偽造的妥協照片或文件給受害者家人，揭發，挑釁，心理戰，心理顛覆，偷聽電話，竊聽，神秘電話呼叫或者不必要的郵寄品，甚至包括寄給目標妻子一個震動按摩棒，通常，受害者並不知道是斯塔西乾的。很多人認為他們喪失了理智，因此精神崩潰，最後可能導致自殺。 What happens during this Gang Stalking surveillance is very similar to what happened to many innocent individuals in the former East Germany or Activists and Dissidents in Russia. Many innocent people in the former East Germany would be targeted for these harassment programs, and then their friends, family, and the community at large would be used to monitor, prosecute, and harass them. In Russia it was used by the state to declare activist, dissidents or anyone they thought to be an enemy of the state as mentally unfit and many were institutionalized using this form of systemic control. 在這種Gang Stalking(團伙跟蹤騷擾)的監視中，被盯的人的遭遇與前東德許多無辜的人或者俄羅斯的激進分子和異見人士的遭遇非常類似。前東德許多無辜的人會成為這些騷擾程序的目標，然後一般說來他們的朋友、家庭以及社團會被利用來監視、迫害和騷擾他們。在俄羅斯，國家通過運用這種系統形式的控制，宣稱激進分子、異見人士以及任何他們認為是國家敵人的人精神不健康，很多人因此被收容治療(送進了精神病院)。 Targeting can happen to anyone in society. In the past primary targets of programs such as Cointelpro have been minorities. Targeting however can happen to anyone. Individuals are often targeted for being outspoken, whistle blowers, dissidents, people who go up against wealthy corporations, woman"s groups, (single) women, anti-war proponents, individuals identified or targeted as problems at these community meetings, and other innocent individuals. The majority of the targets are often not aware that they are being targeted in this way. When a target moves, changes jobs, the harassment still continues. Every time the target moves, the same information, lies, and slander will be spread out into the new community and the systemic monitoring and harassment will continue. Traits of those targeted. 社會中任何人都有可能被盯上。在過去，諸如Cointelpro的程序的主要目標是少數族群。然而，任何人都有可能被盯上。人們常常因為各種原因被盯上，被盯上的人有直言不諱者，檢舉揭發者，持不同政見者，對抗富有企業的人，婦女團體，（單身）女性，反戰倡導者，在社區會議上被確認或盯上的問題人士，以及其他無辜的人。大多數目標常常並沒有意識到他們正在以這種方式被盯上。當一個目標遷移居住地、換工作時，這種騷擾仍然不會停止。每次目標遷移居住地，相同的信息、謊言和誹謗會傳入新的社區，這種系統的監視和騷擾會持續下去。這就是被盯上的人的特點。 a) Classical conditioning. a）經典條件反射。 Getting a Targeted Individual sensitized to an everyday stimuli. The targeted individual over a period of months, or even years is negatively sensitized to an everyday stimuli, which is then used to harass them. It"s used out in public to let them know they are constantly being harassed and monitored. Some examples of everyday stimulus that might be used include: sounds, colors, patterns, actions. Eg. Red, white, yellow, strips, pens clicking, key jangling, loud coughing, loud whistling, loud smacking of clapping of hands together, cell phones, laptops, etc. 使一個被盯的人對某種日常刺激敏感。這個被盯的人經過數月甚至數年的時間對某個日常刺激產生負面的敏感，然後這種刺激就被用於騷擾被盯的人。這種刺激在公共場合被使用，使得被盯的人知道他們正不斷地被騷擾和監視。一些可能被使用的日常刺激的例子包括：聲音，顏色，圖案，活動。比方說，紅色，白色，黃色，條文，咔噠按筆，鑰匙碰撞，大聲咳嗽，大聲吹口騷，大聲拍手，手機，筆記本電腦，等等。 b) 24/7 Surveillance. b）每周7天每天24小時全天候監視。 This will involve following the target everywhere they go. Learning about the target. Where they shop, work, play, who their friends and family are. Getting close to the target, moving into the community or apartment where they live, across the street. Monitoring the targets phone, house, and computer activity. Surveillance Policy. 這種技術包括跟蹤目標去他們去的任何地方。了解目標，他們購物、工作、玩耍的地方，他們的朋友和家人是誰。接近目標，搬入他們居住的社區或公寓所在街道的對面。監視目標的電話，房子和電腦活動。（這就是）監視策略。 c) Isolation of said target. c）孤立上述目標。 This is done via slander campaigns, and lies. Eg. People in the targets community are told that the target is a thief, into drugs, a prostitute, pedophile, crazy, in trouble for something, needs to be watched. Files will even be produced on the target, shown to neighbors, family, store keepers. 這種技術通過誹謗活動和謊言完成。比方說，告訴目標所在社區的人們，目標是個小偷，有毒癮，是個妓女，戀童癖，瘋子，因為某事惹上麻煩，需要被監視。甚至能製造關於目標的文件，展示給（目標的）鄰居、家人、小店主看。 d) Noise and mimicking campaigns. d）噪音和模仿活動。 Disrupting the targets life, sleep with loud power tools, construction, stereos, doors slamming, etc. Talking in public about private things in the targets life. Mimicking actions of the target. Basically letting the target know that they are in the targets life. Daily interferences, nothing that would be too overt to the untrained eye, but psychologically degrading and damaging to the target over time. 擾亂目標的生活，使其伴著大音量的電動工具，建築施工，立體聲，摔門，等等睡覺。公開談論目標生活中的隱私。模仿目標的行為。基本上就是讓目標知道他們在目標生活中的存在。日常干涉，在沒有被騷擾過的人的眼裡並不太明顯，但對目標來說這是長期作用產生的心理折磨和損害。 e) Everyday life breaks and street theatre. e）日常生活打斷和街頭劇院。 Flat tires, sleep deprivation, drugging food, putting dirt on targets property. Mass strangers doing things in public to annoy targets. These strangers might get text messaged to be at a specific time and place, and perform a specific action. 刺破輪胎，睡眠剝奪，食物下藥，在目標所有物上放泥土。大批陌生人當眾做某些事惹惱目標。這些陌生人可能收到簡訊通知在某個特定時間和地點進行某項特定活動。 It might seem harmless to these Citizen Informants, but it could be causing great psychological trauma for the target. Eg. Blocking targets path, getting ahead of them in line, cutting or boxing them in on the road, saying or doing things to elicit a response from targets. Etc. It"s like the death of a thousand paper cuts. One or two minor incidents will not cause any harm to the target, but over time the target is slowly worn down. 這種騷擾可能在這些平民線人看來是無害的，但它能給目標造成巨大的心理創傷。比方說，堵塞目標的路，插隊到目標前面，在路上割傷或拳擊目標，說一些話或做一些事以引起目標做出某種反應，等等。這種騷擾就像成千上萬的紙片切割致死一樣。一兩個小事件並不會給目標造成傷害，但是經過長時間作用目標會慢慢磨損以至筋疲力盡。二、某區域Zersetzung的組織分工和作案手段 Zersetzung的組織分工和一般刑事案件的偵查分工原理是一樣的，其所能調集的社會資源是很大的，包括：熟悉掌握受害人生活求學工作經歷，掌握受害人家庭結構和背景（親戚朋友），掌握受害人性格習好等等，在掌握和控制這些基礎工作後才對受害人發動攻擊。熔斷小組主要由醫學（心理藥理毒理）專家、電腦網路專家、刑偵專家組成，他們分工明確，組織嚴密，行動高潮時十幾個人為一作戰小組，，殺人而不直接接觸，基本達到了孫子的最高境界：不戰而屈人之兵，殺人於無形之法。而Zersetzung小組主要作案手段集中反應在以下七個方面： 1、煽動社會踐踏受害人人格尊嚴：如孤立歧視、侮辱刁難等。他們行動時都以警察或者政府公務員的身份打著執法的幌子，把受害人描述成殺人犯或貪污犯，以此煽動社會迫害。 2、破壞：包括破壞家庭、婚姻，這主要是為了更好控制孤立受害人的目的。破壞名譽，也包括破壞物品。 3、暗中下藥下慢毒。 4、噪音：包括住所旁突發增多的裝修敲打、鑽擊、切割音，也包括鄰居大力關門關窗聲，還有不少反應沿途陌生人對其作大聲吐口水聲。總之24小時聲聲不斷地騷擾受害人。 5、立體監控：電話手機網路通訊等 6、扣上怪名怪病：通常以精神病居多。 7、迷惑誘騙設套陷害。主要在意識潛意識方面寫入或間接暗示等方式麻痹受害人。而這些手段的使用，就是對受害人進行思維攻擊、心靈摧殘、意志破壞、肉體折磨，全方位操控受害人意識、潛意識，征服受害人心智（敏感緊張恐懼無助絕望），最終達到誘導和逼迫目標人自殺。

謝邀。

我我看過這個新聞，對這個事情本身了解的不多，不知道來龍去脈。從警幾年我知道了很多事情不能單憑某一個人或一個單位的一面之詞，所以這種事情不敢妄議。

我只想說幾點。

第一，這種事情好多國家都發生過，部隊也有。我們國家槍支管理這麼嚴格都難免，你想想那些對槍械不管制的國家會怎樣！

第二，警察壓力大，不解釋，懂得人自然懂，不用解釋，不懂的人，你解釋一百遍也沒用。

第三，執法環境不好。

第四，的確存在少數人敢挑戰（甚至……）警察的耐心，脾氣和尊嚴，有一個，就夠你受的。

第五，越是基層，法律的威嚴性越不足。

第六，願兇手早日繩之以法！