如何給金融危機後的各大投行排名?
金融危機後,金融圈大洗牌。6年過去了,期間很多銀行都進行了大的業務調整,銀行間也是跑馬圈地重新劃分勢力範圍,那麼現在應該如何給這些大行們坐次?他們的改革成功嗎?前景如何?誰更加崛起,誰在走下坡路? 高盛,摩根斯坦利,摩根大通,美銀美林,瑞銀,瑞信,德銀,巴克萊 等,望高手指教
Update: a chart I saw on a bank"s presentation:
------------------------------------------------------
回到家了, 我把它翻譯了吧
-----
請不要轉載, 複製粘貼任何數字.但是結論請隨便拿, 不要客氣.此排名是按照Global Revenue(全球收入)來製作的, 不要把它當作相對優勢, 薪水, bonus, tier capital或者盈利水平等等的排名. 我本來想把它寫的很直觀, 可是我實在我不能把我們分析師的圖表發到網上, 所以就放一個大概的數字和結論吧.This is a ranking for Bulge Brackets based on Global Revenue, don"t use it as a rank for competitiveness, salary, tier capital. leverage, or ROE, etc...
I wanted to make this as straightforward as possible. But I just can"t post analyst"s spreadsheets and charts online. So rough numbers and conclusion only.
1. All these numbers are top line GLOBAL revenue, LTM (Q4 2012 - Q3 2013).
2. It only includes traditional sell-side functions for the banks, namely IBD and ST. Commercial Banking and Buyside business (Asset Management/PE/PWM) is not part of the analysis3. I just want to show the scale, so I"ll rank the banks and only give the first two digits. (All public information. You can find the exact numbers if you want)4. The analysis is across four currencies: Euro, USD, Swiss Francs, Great Britain Pounds. The spot prices used in the analysis are: CHF: 0.886; GBP: 1.65, Eur: 1.3755. Number in millions, USD排名(以下我就不知道怎麼翻譯了, 翻譯了也沒什麼意義):
Ranking:
Total Underwriting:
BAC: 5100JPM: 5000GS: 3800Citi: 3200DB: 3100HSBC: 3000MS: 3000CS: 3000UBS: 2300
MA Advisory:
GS: 1900JPM: 1300MS: 1300BAC: 1100CS: 900Citi: 800DB: 700UBS: 600Total IB Fees (Underwriting + Advisory)
JPM: 6400BAC: 6200GS: 5700MS: 4200Citi: 4000DB: 3800CS: 3800Barc: 3700HSBC: 3000UBS: 3000
SOCGEN: 2400Sales and Trading (Equity)
GS: 7300MS: 6400CS: 5200JPM 4800Barc: 4300UBS: 4200BAC: 4000
DB: 3700SOCGEN: 3300Citi: 3000HSBC: 900Sales and Trading (FICC)
JPM: 15400Citi: 13500DB: 10100BARC: 10000GS: 9100
BAC: 9100HSBC: 5600CS: 5600MS: 4300SOCGEN: 3400UBS: 1800Sales and Trading Total
JPM: 20000 (excluding additional 5500 Other Lending Securities Services)Citi: 16500 (excluding additional 3200 Other Lending Securities Services)GS: 16000Barc: 14500DB: 14000BAC: 13000CS: 10500MS: 10500HSBC: 7000SOCGEN: 6500UBS: 6000Overall (IB + Trading):
JPM: 26400 (excluding additional 5500 Other Lending Securities Services)GS: 21700Citi: 20500 (excluding additional 3200 Other Lending Securities Services)BAC: 19200Barc: 18200DB: 17800MS: 14700CS: 14200HSBC: 10000UBS: 9000SOCGEN: 8900 BNP: 7400結論:
從全球收入的角度來看:無敵巨無霸級: 摩根大通
巨型級: 高盛, 花旗, 美國銀行美林大型級: 巴克萊, 德意志中型級: 摩根斯坦利, 瑞信小型級: HSBC, 瑞銀, 法興, 巴黎銀行等MA活動開始變多以後, 高盛和摩根斯坦利的排名可能會上升一個檔次. 但是摩根大通在可預見的未來里會當很久的巨無霸.
Conclusion:
In terms of global revenue generation ability:Titanic: JP Morgan Huge: Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America Merrill LynchGlobal presence: Barclays, Deutsche BankSpecilized: Morgan Stanley, Credit SuisseRegional: HSBC, UBS, Societe Generale, BNP ParibasPossible change in the future: Maybe when the MA activity picks up, GS and MS could advance one tier in this ranking, but JPM will be the absolute No.1 revenue generator in the near future.金融危機其實主要的變化就是commercial bank的生命力增強了,很多以前投行業務更強的專業投行被重創。但是在投行的世界裡,對於個人而言,GS,MS仍然是好的選擇,JP,CS,DB這些仍然是一些二三線的選擇。對於中國人來說,考慮到個人成長,CICC,Citics,haitong仍然是更適合國人成功的起點。
高盛 jpmorgan 瑞信 前景不錯美林不大行 瑞銀如果能少些bureacracy就好了 其他的感覺沒差
歪個樓,可以參見http://equity-research.com的下列排名,更新至2015年10月:List of top 200 investment banks and boutiquesList里將投行按規模和收入劃分為三大類:"
- Large, International Investment Banks – 10 Banks
- Large, Mid-sized, and Prestigious Boutique Investment Banks – 40 Banks
- Boutique Investment Banks – 150 Banks"
推薦閱讀:
※銀行的投資銀行業務只是諮詢類的業務嗎?
※皮膚不好可以進投行嗎?
※從專業角度來說資產管理(asset management)和財富管理(wealth management)之間的區別是什麼?
※求解,為什麼康考迪亞大學畢業進投行的人那麼多?
※在倫敦從事金融工作是什麼樣的體驗?