拳法怎麼分的內外啊？

12-31

怎麼算是內家拳啊？怎麼又是外家拳啊？怎麼分的…我現在聽著像是什麼拳都是內家拳啊。太極形意八卦心意通背八極詠春梅花…

本人首先不是專家，學過點太極拳，形意拳，還有拳擊（是不是很分裂？）這幾種拳算是非常典型的內家和外家了吧。咱們不要歪樓，去討論傳統武術和西洋搏擊哪個厲害，只聊聊內家外家。我個人的體會是，所謂內外家是鍛煉方法不同，或者再明顯一點說是鍛煉順序不同。

內家更強調發勁原理，說玄一點就是內勁。拋開很多人不相信的內息之類的，說俗點，內勁就是全身協調發力，追求把全身力量盡量不浪費地基於一點放出去。為達到這個目的，所有內家拳都講究樁，都特彆強調放鬆，因為這樣能夠讓力量在關節間不間斷不浪費地傳輸。

於是，大家看到內家拳修習者整天干這個。但是一個有點追求的內家拳手很快就發現，要想實戰，僅僅會發勁是不夠的，還要有過硬的體質，耐力，實戰經驗等等，於是開始訓練這些項目。本人先學的內家拳，後學的拳擊，臉皮厚點說，我學拳擊很快就上手了，這是得益於長時間的內家拳訓練。

而外家拳在順序上是相反的，就以拳擊為例，教練會教授學員正確的姿勢，其實所謂正確的姿勢就包含了發勁原理，只是他沒有像內家拳那麼極度的強調。一個從拳擊開始學習的人，只要用點心，或者只要嚴格按照教練的姿勢堅持練習，他最終也能悟出正確的高效的發力方法，也就是全身力量基於一點爆發。

由此，我的觀點是，內家拳的訓練更像演繹法，外家拳的鍛煉更像歸納法（即內家拳由內到外，外家拳由外到內）。至於哪種更好我不好說，因人而異吧。但有一點可以確定，都需要悟性。對於悟性高的人，演繹法和歸納法最後結果都一樣。

順便說一下，我個人體會就是殊途同歸。我驚訝的發現，太極拳和拳擊，至少在發力方面根本就是一樣的，都追求腳下發力，都追求關節的轉換，都追求節省能量，高效發揮。習武者和普通人的一個巨大的差別就是，假如一個人的能量是100，習武者可以一擊發揮出80甚至更高，普通人能發揮30就不錯。假如一個普通人能量是1000，那他什麼都不會也能發揮出300，已經高出你100的上限了（這裡暫時不考慮技巧）。這就是所謂一力降十會。

拳不分內外，是人分的。

看近身到什麼程度，武術里打的最遠的是戳腳，打的最近的是心意拳（石家莊有種綿張拳，也打的很小），這兩個都是很古老的拳種，也代表了兩種思路的極端，大部分拳種都介於這兩者之間。打遠的是考慮了群戰，打近的更多了考慮了雙人格鬥。

在 Quora上有個人也說了這個問題。

鏈接：http://www.quora.com/What-are-some-of-the-real-benefits-of-internal-martial-arts

全文複製：

This question is somewhat not appropriate. To understand why it is not appropriate, we have first to make clear what these terms internal (nei) and external (wai) mean. And when referring to them, we are specifically talking about Chinese martial arts, because it is these martial arts that make quite a noise about these terms.

There"s nothing more confusing in Chinese martial arts than this separation between internal and external. They are not just used in terms such internal martial arts (Neijia-quan) and external martial arts (Waijia-quan), but to other related terms as well. For example:

Neisanhe (three internal harmonies) and Waisanhe (three external harmonies)
Neigong (internal workout) and Waigong (external workout)

These terms are also often used in the context of something that may not relate to martial arts directly, yet adding more confusion into the things. For example, internal may refer to Taoism because Taoism is China"s origin, while external may refer to Budhism because Budhism is India"s origin (China"s external). This separation seems legitimate if we are referring to two famous schools, Wudang (Taoism) and Shaolin (Budhism). However, if we look closer, these schools are not specifically schools of martial arts. They are more appropriate to be categorized as schools of thoughts. We can be sure that this separation is not correct because most of martial arts practiced in Shaolin are just China"s origin; thus referring to this context, Shaolin"s martial arts should be called internal martial arts as well.

Then the worst thing is as if there"s an unspoken competition between internal and external. Somehow, something that is "more" internal is perceived as a better martial arts, which is as a result, people out of nowhere start to "transform" their arts into something more "internal". They all are just adding more confusion to something that"s already confusing enough.

Let"s understanding them by discussing their meanings in Chinese martial arts in a more specific definition. First is the definition of internal and external themselves:

Internal refers to some types of practices that we cannot see directly what"s going on.
External refers to some types of practices that we can see directly what"s going on.

By holding on this definition, we could make some things clearer. Here is a more thoroughly discussion about those terms.

1. Neisanhe and Waisanhe (three internal harmonies and three external harmonies)

Three internal harmonies are referring to a good coordination between:

(1) Xin (heart / mentality) and yi (intention / what movement)

(2) Yi and qi (energy / power regulator - NOT just energy per se)

(3) Qi and li (energy / power)

Three external harmonies are referring to a good coordination between:

(1) Shoulder and waist

(2) Elbow and knee

(3) Arm and leg

Obviously the first three harmonies cannot be seen, and the later three harmonies could be seen. However, there would be no sensible martial arts that doesn"t emphasize on those six harmonies as a whole. Chinese martial arts even coin a complete name for them: Liuhe (six harmonies). It"s the same with other martial arts, they just call it with different name.

2. Neijiaquan and Waijiaquan (internal and external martial arts)

Internal martial arts are often associated with softness, while external martial arts are often associated with hardness. But that"s not right. Not all of internal martial arts are soft, for example Xingyi-quan. And not all of external martial arts are hard, for example: Baihe-quan.

If someone is practicing how to punch correctly, we can clearly see how his fist and arm move. That is the external part of the movement. What we cannot see clearly is how his leg changes, how his waist moves, how his torso moves, how his weight is transferred, how his breathing is done, etc. This is the internal part of martial arts. No one could punch correctly without applying all those aspects, internal and external as a whole, correctly.

Hence there"s no martial arts that doesn"t have all those two aspects internal and external. For example, let"s comparing boxing and Taijiquan. Boxing is without doubt would be considered by many people as an "external" martial arts. Taijiquan is without doubt would be considered by many people as "internal" martial arts. Does boxing have all those aspects? Yes. Does Taijiquan have all those aspects? Obviously.

This separation is vague at best.

3. Neigong and Waigong (internal and external conditioning)

Neigong and waigong are two types of practice to strengthen the body of a martial artist. Neigong is about practicing Jing, Qi, and Shen (essence, energy regulator, and spirit) by meditation, specific breathing techniques, and specific movements to build Dantian, etc. (Note: it"s not Dantian in a sense of body"s centre of gravity, but Dantian as a Qi reservoir.) Waigong is about practicing Jin, Gu, and Pi (muscle, bone, and skin), that is to strengthen the muscle and tendon, harden the bone, and increase the tolerance to pain. Because we cannot see Jing, Qi, and Shen, its practice is called as internal. The later, Waigong, is called external, because we can clearly see what"s going on when someone is pumping his muscle, crushing his leg into a pole, and brushing his hand and face into sands or rice grains.

In a glance, it seems that Neigong is the one that differentiates internal and external martial arts. Unfortunately, it"s not quite so either. MOST of internal martial arts practitioners such Taijiquan, Xingyiquan, Baguazhang, etc, do not practice Neigong. Actually, Neigong is not necessarily included in their curricula. You are very lucky if you could find one. Contrary to popular belief, your slow movement and relax breathing in doing your form, is not Neigong at all - far from it. See Ari Royce"s answer to What is Neigong. And many practitioners of martial arts that are often categorized as external martial arts, do practice Neigong. For example, some martial arts taught at Shaolin, incorporate Neigong in their curricula.

It should be clear by now the reason of separation between Neisanhe (three internal harmonies) and Waisanhe (three external harmonies), and between Neigong (internal workout) and Waigong (external workout). What is still not clear is the separation between Neijia-quan (internal martial arts) and Waijia-quan (external martial arts) because they all incorporate both aspects, be-seen and not-be-seen as well.

Apparently, things that make some styles are categorized as internal and the other as external, are the order of their curricula, not their final achievement.

Neijia-quan starts its training by high stand posture, and just after quite some time, could be years, it practices lower and lower stand. It focuses more on correct posture before building a strong leg. Waijia-quan starts its training by low stand posture. Obviously it first builds strong leg, but wait, including a correct posture. So, Neijia-quan practitioners believe that a correct posture cannot be develop in the same time with strength development, but Waijia-quan practitioners believe that the correct posture could be developed in the same time with strength development.
Neijia-quan starts its training by slow movement. It want to first focus on the correct way of how we move our waist, our torso, transfer our weight, what muscle or no-muscle being used, etc, before building speed and explosive power. Waijia-quan starts by immediately executing fast and explosive movements. Waijia-quan practitioners believe that the correct movement could be developed in the same time with speed and explosive power development.
Neijia-quan practitioners like to emphasize more on un-seen concept. For example, Taiji-quan emphasizes more on our understanding of Peng, Lu, Ji, An (upper back muscle, no muscle / let loose, lower back muscle, chest muscle). Obviously none of these things could be seen clearly. A good teacher would let his student to touch his body in order to make him understand. On the other hand, Baji-quan would first immediately focus on how to use elbow, fist, and shoulder. All these things, when executed, could be seen clearly.

That"s some of the best differentiations we could have regarding to internal and external martial arts. Which would bring us back to our original question:

"What are some of the real benefits of internal martial arts?"

The answer is: NOTHING IS MORE SIGNIFICANT THAN THE EXTERNAL ONE. And it"s not even an appropriate question, as it is like we are asking: "which one is tastier, apple or orange?" May be because something that we cannot see is usually connoted to something more scary, more magical, something that we keep as an ultimate secret weapon, people praise the internal part of martial arts as a more precious part. But it"s not the case. For example, move with slow movement first.. even a boxing trainer would direct his trainee to punch with a rather slow movement first. Of course, the speed would be increased in just one day. But does it make less effective? Get the best Taiji-quan practitioner, let him try to "Lu" a boxer"s jab. Rest assured, internal and external are both equally good.

However, there"s one more thing that is specifically true regarding Chinese martial arts, either internal or external, that is, I"m talking about Neigong. Well, at least, according to my opinion:

All traditional Chinese martial arts have one thing in common, that is, every its practitioner must be able to execute, either blocking, deflecting, or striking, from any position, without having to first take a stand. They must be able to move in a continuous fashion. In order to do that, their practitioners must have a very very good reflex. Reflex can only be "doped" by "doping", aka our metabolism enhancement. Neigong is an ancient way of doing doping, with one difference, Neigong"s "doping" is done naturally through proper internal practice of Jing, Qi, and Shen. Surely it will also give more power and bigger resistance to blow, but reflex booster is something that we cannot get from other kind of practices.

I never saw one, not in the street, not in any mixed martial arts brawl. It"s my biggest expectation, that one day, I could see one legitimate Neigong practitioner in a beautiful fight. I hope some true Neigong masters, or some true Neigong master"s friends, read this, and considering this seriously.

關於內家拳與外家拳最早記載見效於；《王征南墓志銘》是現存最早記述內家拳名稱概念、「少林以拳勇名天下。然主於搏人。人亦得以乘之。有所謂內家者。以靜制動。犯者應手即仆。故別少林為外家。」明清之際內家拳僅為一個拳種,外家拳僅指少林拳,到民國期間發展成「凡主於搏人」「亦足以通利關節」者,概稱「外家拳」;凡注重「以靜制動」「得於導引者為多「概稱為」內家拳「，後有把太極、形意卦歸為內家拳的說法。

翻譯一下禪劍分享的答案，先翻譯一部分，剩下的有空再翻譯

原文地址：

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-of-the-real-benefits-of-internal-martial-arts

這個問題這麼問不合適的，至於為什麼不合適，我們先要搞清楚內和外什麼意思。當提到內外，我們特指中國武術，因為中國武術產生了這些個觀點。

沒什麼比內外更暈的了，這個不僅用於內家拳和外家拳，更如：內三合，外三和，內功，外功……

這些東西也用於和武術沒直接關係的地方，這更暈了。。。比如：說到內功會提到道教，因為道教是中國的起源，然後外功提到佛教，因為佛教是印度的起源。這種分類是合適的，如果我們提到少林和武當。但是如果我們細看，他們並不是專門的武術學校。把他們歸類為思想的學校更合適。我們可以確定這種分類是不對的因為大多數少林武術是中國起源，從這個意義上說，少林武術也該叫做內家功。

所以最糟糕的是內和外有種說不出的競爭（comptetition). 莫名其妙的，更內的武術感覺更強。導致人都把自己的武術搞的很內，這隻會讓本來就暈的東西更暈。。。。

讓我們先討論一下他們在中國武術中的定義吧。先看內外的定義：

內是我們看不見的修行

外是我們可以直接看到的

有了這樣的觀點，一切就清晰多了。下面是更細緻的討論：

1.內三合，外三和：

內三合是某種協調存在於：

(1)心和意

（2）意和氣

（3）氣和力

外三和指的是協調存在於：

肩和腰

胳膊肘和膝蓋

胳膊和腿

顯然，內三合看不見，外三和可以看見。但是，沒有不強調這六者為一體的武術。中國武術甚至創造一個完整的名字：六合。其他武術也是這樣，只不過名字不同。

2.內家拳和外家拳

內家拳總和柔韌性聯繫在一起，外家拳總和「硬打」聯繫在一起。但這是不對的。不是所有內家拳都是柔韌的，比如形意拳。也不是所有外家拳都是硬打，比如白鶴拳。

如果有人正練習怎麼正確擊打，我們能清楚的看到他們胳膊怎麼運動。那是運動的「外。我們看不到的是腿怎麼變化，腰怎麼變化，驅趕怎麼運動，重心怎麼轉移，呼吸怎麼控制，等等。這是武術的「內」。不把這些內外結合的東西控制好，是不能正確擊打的。

所以，武術都有內外兩方面。比如，對比一下拳擊和太極拳，拳擊毫無疑問被很多人認為是外家拳，太極拳被認為是內家拳。但是拳擊有上面提到的這些方面嗎？有。太極拳呢？有。這種分類充其量是模糊的。

個人認為內外家的區分是瞎扯，可能是我見識短淺吧。

上面的答案有的人是不露活，大多數人是壓根自己就沒練明白內家拳。

先佔個坑。

從勁力，功夫上，真心認為不太應該人為的分成內外家。因為最終的結果，不同拳種，甚至拳擊散打mma，訓練正確，持之以恆，到了一定高度以後，勁力都接近（武術一途貌似要有結果太玄幻）。

之所以這樣說，是因為見過打的曼妙輕柔的南拳前輩，山崩地裂的太極朋友（每次練發力我就覺得他是想拆樓），六合整勁的老外拳擊手（這個是電視上看到的），一背的翻浪勁，居然只是在鋤草的常年農活的中年壯漢。。。

那一定要分的話，內外有什麼不同呢？或者說不同武術種類不同拳種有什麼不同呢？

首先是練法。普遍看有兩種典型差異。一是以柔入鋼，一是以剛入柔。

一種是先學會發小的勁，甚至多數時候只是感知而不是發，然後由小練到大。一種是練力同時不斷調整，把長力練成短勁。根據不同的人的特點，有分難易。我就覺得前一種我學不會。

有朋友說了，形意也是內家，為什麼也是以剛入柔呢？有興趣的朋友可以去研究下形意的發展，以及目前的流派，也是很有意思的。

其他的差別就是打法了。打法這個東西，其實有功夫，怎麼打都好啦沒什麼好說的。

內家拳是體認功夫，內家拳發勁精妙纖微，口不能言語，心不能思維，不能落文字，可以體會，只能體會。

好比你讓我教你游泳，你問我：「我在岸上比劃得完美，一下水就不會遊了，怎麼回事。」我怎麼知道怎麼回事，我只知道一腳把你踹下水。

所以，凡是給內家拳發勁下定義的都是偽言。

我知道你們不愛聽這些話，但這些是實話。

你們愛聽Billy的話，Billy說：「內勁就是全身協調發力，追求把全身力量盡量不浪費地基於一點放出去。」然而，外家拳發力也是全身協調發力，追求把全身力量盡量不浪費地基於一點放出去。那你什麼意思啊？內家拳創始人巧立名目，故弄玄虛，居心叵測，是不是？內家拳修鍊法磨人，出功夫遠遠比外家拳慢，最後還跟你「殊途同歸」了，練內家拳的人都是傻的。是不是？無怪乎，練內家的人紛紛都轉外家了，真是聰明啊。

你們就愛聽這樣的話，因為你們能聽懂，你們也聽不懂別的「故弄玄虛」的，說別人傻總比承認有自己不懂的存在好。

Billy這個人是真誠的，他說的有2點對：

1.內家功底是修外家拳極大的助力，這是真的。但是另一點他不知道，外家功底是修內家拳極大的阻力，Billy的拳擊練成了，他的內家之路也就前功盡棄到此為止了。

2.外家拳「其實所謂正確的姿勢就包含了發力原理」，這是真的。外家拳只有擺出了特定的固定的姿勢，才能發力，內家拳發勁不依賴於特定的固定的姿勢。有一句話講「練功融入生活」，這是內家拳所獨有的，等公交時扎個馬步，這根本不叫融，這是用練功切割生活，你用刀切肉不能說刀融入肉了，刀是刀，肉是肉。

最後再多說兩句，聽不懂也不要噴。內家拳是從道家出來的，道家那幫人思路跟正常人都是反的！你們知不知道。外家拳是追求生得強盛，更高，更快，更強的。道家那幫人是追求道的，知不知道！道是柔弱了，不生不滅的，綿綿若存的，知不知道！能跟你們殊途同歸了，那真是活見鬼了！

一個從內而外，一個從外而內，一個練柔到剛，一個練剛至柔，高手都會剛柔相濟。

咱們直觀一點，我拿京劇舉個例子。

外家：

御果園金秀山視頻

內家：

御果園提起了當年投大原裘盛戎視頻

我練的詠春不說自己內家也不說自己外家。拿什麼標準去判斷內外呢？實在沒有準確或者合適的標準？內練氣？洪拳等很多南拳一樣要練吞吐，外練皮？太極等內家的不可能磨點手皮都沒有吧？

權威的回答：善養氣者為內家，不善養氣者為外家。開創宋氏形意拳一脈的宋世榮老前輩的回答，孫祿堂前輩附議的答案。

但是這個答案太高深，一般人連這二位前輩所定義的「氣」的概念都不知為何物，所附會者太多。僅提出來作為註腳之一吧。

簡單的回答：在拳術界的現在，會練樁、用樁的為內家，不會的為外家。真正的內家拳無不是以樁架結構為技擊根本依託，樁勁變化為克敵致勝的手段立足的。此外凡是講究拳腳摔拿組合攻擊，重拳重腿擊倒等（含摔拿等）為唯一手段和技擊理論的，都是外家拳。

內外家在技擊價值方面沒有高低上下之分，有區別的不過是人而已。內家優於外家的，只在理趣方面。內家是講理的拳，講究是我對了，你錯了，你就必輸。這是內家的魅力之一；同時在健身養生方面，也有與丹道、中醫等息息相關的理論，這是它的魅力之二。

僅就技擊方面而言，內家拳並不是說必勝外家拳，雖然從理論角度來講，內家高手是比外家高手有優勢的。而且，在快速出技擊能力方面，內家比外家還慢。一個真正的內家拳好手，快則3年，慢則10年才出來。而外家拳，可能1年最多2年就差不多了。

大致如此吧。

——————————修改分割線 16.05.19————————————————————————

拳法無內外之分，不過僅僅是一句政治正確的話罷了。

下面這幾個視頻，就是內家拳。

布衣的柔身三法

布衣的螳螂拳

螳螂劈手_土豆

螳螂崩錘，麒麟步

而這些視頻：

于海老師演練的螳螂拳

【珍貴資料】遼寧武術挖掘

蘇昱彰八極螳螂拳

都是外家拳。

看明白區別了么？！

首先，什麼是外家拳？什麼又是內家拳？實際上真正的傳統武術、古拳法都是講究內外兼修的，何來內外之分？只是側重不同。我不認同有「外家」，也不認同有「內家」。只認為有「內行」「外行」「贏家」「輸家」！！所以當你看到某人練拳，覺得他練的是外家拳的時候，那麼，只有兩種原因。一，他是外行（自學者或者無明師指點不得要領），二，你是外行（內在的東西看不到，也看不懂）。

內煉一口氣外煉筋骨皮

我個人認為外家的整是局部的整勁，內家拳的整是整體的整勁。這是我認為他們的區別，至於呼吸方面，外家和內家都有涉及。

用我師父的話來說，可以從打法上來分辨，

外家拳是偷襲拳，找機會找空擋來打人。

內家拳的機會是自己打出來的，一力降十會，管你什麼防守架構，我整體架構迎過來，挨著就炸，把你的結構炸開，然後隨著我打。

簡單總結一下上面對於內家拳的描述：不可言說、很難出功夫，但是練好了非常厲害，練到終極是道，似乎能飛天升仙。不可言說和很難出功夫大家都了解了，氣啊內勁這些東西不能用文字表達，不能口頭描述，只能靠師傅言傳身教，而師傅能都大隱隱於市，能夠得見全靠緣分。習練更是難上加難，沒有三年五載的苦練入不了門，沒有十年的功夫打不了人。但是練成之後非常厲害，一招制敵，一拳把人崩飛出去，簡直是飛天遁地無所不能，不過遺憾的是，由於內家拳對人精神和氣質的鍛煉，大師們都淡泊名利，不願意顯山露水，目前實戰效果全靠講故事「我師傅如何如何」「我朋友如何如何」這種套路來傳播，沒有大型比賽視頻供我們瞻仰。至於得道升仙我就說不準了，雖然據我所知楊露禪，董海川，尚雲祥這些人都去世了，但他們是不是元神出竅，精神升仙那就不清楚了。

另一方面，大師們看不上的外家功夫，拳擊柔術泰拳，乃至現代詠春螳螂拳，確實逼格差了很多，滿世界的教學視頻資料，隨便一搜索就有，教練一個動作一個動作講解，要多直白有多直白，一點都不高深。訓練場館更是到處都是，還有認證機構，連鎖經營，明碼標價，滿是銅臭味，比著公園裡神龍見首不見尾的大師不知道差到哪裡去了。而且練得全是肌肉死力氣，什麼胸肌腹肌二頭肌全都鼓起來，一塊一塊的難看死了，哪裡比得上大師們渾圓的身材。最丟人的是居然上擂台打比賽，為了一點錢和名聲就到籠子里跟人打，和動物有什麼區別？練武就要修身養性，只要出手你就輸了，最高深的武術就是練一輩子從沒出手打人，一個眼神就讓對手下跪。

所以內外不重要，重要的是你個人需求是什麼。我不知道別人啊，我這個人品味差，就喜歡練一身肌肉吸引妹子；境界低，就喜歡速成的，練一年就能打人那種低等功夫；沒文化，只能看得懂生物醫學體育學的科普文章，看不懂玄而又玄的經書。我這種人就襯練練沒水平的外家拳，如果你想學文化、長知識、提升自己的哲學境界，希望有朝一日能悟道升仙，肯定是內家拳更適合你。

都閃開，用歷史唯物主義觀點作答。

一，器械拳術化。

明末清初的禁武和火器的逐漸盛行。刀槍劍棍的傷人取命技術縮小為鏢局和保鏢行業，技術形式變為拳腳。

二，拳術玩意化。

清末民初，大量拳師進京入滬教拳為生。京滬兩地沒有情節惡劣後果嚴重的殺戮，拳論和拳式有足夠的空間和時間打磨得光滑和精深。

三，裝逼標籤化

進入現代，學拳者的身份和心態多樣化。為了拔高和區別，又再次玄化哲學化「內家拳」拳理。

滿意嗎？

我理解的內外是這樣的。

外家功夫，注重招式，擊打的方式，就像行兵布陣，各式各樣的陣法。有三萬人就用三萬人，糧草有限，時間緊迫，制敵方法怎麼能贏怎麼來，未必就是剛猛的，也未必就是陰柔的。

內家功夫，以招式摧內勁，而運用責靈活多變，八卦六十四變化，太極變化無窮無盡，論打法，三天三夜講不完，論絕招汗牛充棟運不完，但是內家拳的根基必須牢，三萬人就是打不過五萬人，內勁不夠，招式再華麗也是虛的，所謂練拳不練功，到老一場空。

若論內外的強弱高低，我看拳真沒有高低之分，而內外之分也並不明確，所謂內外也只是理想中的內外。就現代來說，內外結合才是並行不悖的光明大道。

就像拳分內外，人分內外嗎？

一家之言，歡迎品評，為免遭記恨，藏身片刻。見諒。