截止 2017 年 6 月,韓春雨事件有哪些進展?


找了一下最新的應當是這個https://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v35/n5/full/nbt0517-481a.html

原文

The editors of Nature Biotechnology are issuing an editorial expression of concern regarding this article to alert our readers to concerns regarding the reproducibility of the original results. At this time, we are publishing the results of three groups (http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3753) that have tried to reproduce the results in the critical Figure 4 in the original paper by Han and colleagues, which demonstrates editing of endogenous genomic loci in mammalian cells. None of the groups observed any induction of mutations by NgAgo at any of the loci or under any of the conditions tested above the sensitivity of the assays used. Similar results have been recently reported by a different group of authors in Protein Cell (doi:10.1007/s13238-016-0343-9).
We are in contact with the authors, who are investigating potential causes for the lack of reproducibility. The authors have been informed of this statement. While the investigations are ongoing, Chunyu Han and Xiao Z. Shen agree with this editorial expression of concern. Feng Gao, Feng Jiang and Yongqiang Wu do not feel that it is appropriate at this time.
We will update our readers once these investigations are complete.

好吧修改一下。

大意是說到目前為止幾個小組都還沒能重複出原paper中情況,他們也跟原作者說了這個問題,雙方保持著溝通。。。

講道理,估計這個事情也就這麼過去了,我覺得韓經費到手不會搭理他們,媒體也不會再跟進了。

原來或許還需要找水軍幫自己洗一洗,現在韓終於發現自己只要不說話,人們就會忘掉這個事情。

另外目前有三個答案被摺疊,對比了被摺疊的答案和沒被摺疊的答案,我懷疑我的答案之所以能被留下是因為我一開始沒有翻譯的緣故。


小保方晴子的老師死得好冤


為什麼Nature還沒有最終下令撤回……?


半夜沒事做想起來這回事就搜了一下。


我很好奇河北科技大今年如何招生


韓老師還是有實力的,捅了天大的漏子還是泰然處之,一切都沒逃出掌控,笑看風雲過。


沈嘯和韓春雨的PCT專利申請在WIPO網站上已經可以查到


推薦閱讀:

如何評價韓春雨拒絕提供原始數據的行為?
如何看待韓春雨的ngago基因敲除技術在斑馬魚中得到的「敲低效果」?
如何評價 9 月 6 日韓春雨回應《自然》已證實實驗可重複,但還有不確定因素影響實驗結果?
如何看待《討論韓春雨基因編輯技術爭議 先弄清四個問題》?
如何看待11月23日Nature對韓春雨爭論的最新報道?

TAG:科研 | 生物學 | 生物 | 中國科研 | 韓春雨人物 |